Home | Open Account | Help | 386 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Steam & Excursion > JCL 113Date: 09/29/14 05:36 JCL 113 Author: m1bprr Date: 09/29/14 05:37 Re: JCL 113 Author: m1bprr Date: 09/29/14 05:38 Re: JCL 113 Author: m1bprr Date: 09/29/14 07:19 Re: JCL 113 Author: Frisco1522 What kind of mechanical problems was she having a couple weeks ago when the doubleheader trip was scheduled?
Date: 09/29/14 08:24 Re: JCL 113 Author: MarkMeoff Are they ever going to jacket that engine?
Date: 09/29/14 09:55 Re: JCL 113 Author: flash34 Don, I heard it was an air problem.
Posted from iPhone Date: 09/29/14 17:34 Re: JCL 113 Author: np2526 Both the loco and the business car need a shed for protection from the elements (I know, easier said than done). Has vandalism been a problem? Nice work just the same.
Date: 09/29/14 19:06 Re: JCL 113 Author: OCtrainguy I would've loved to have been able to get out there, but home projects needed my attention. I hope to see the CNJ 113 running again soon.
Date: 09/30/14 09:34 Re: JCL 113 Author: Mgoldman MarkMeoff Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Are they ever going to jacket that engine? Short answer - "YES". I heard once the engine proves it's reliability, the jacket will come. It maybe what needed proving has already justified adding the jacketing. Ie; recent issues might not interfere with the decision to add the jacketing. /Mitch Date: 09/30/14 14:18 Re: JCL 113 Author: Keystone1 IMHO...if they would just feed the locomotive 20% Bituminus and 80% Anthracite, or, down to 50% x 50% mix of each, I would bet that she steams just fine. All this Wootten firebox/Phoebe snow business is OK to a point... (marketing/advertising) that is, but throw in a little Kentucky Lignite in there will get up a real head of steam and plenty of photo run smoke!
|