Home Open Account Help 337 users online

Steam & Excursion > Mini Pacifics


Date: 12/19/14 09:44
Mini Pacifics
Author: africansteam

Earlier this week, in conjunction with Martin's posts on the restoration of the Skookum, Wag216 reminded us of Skookum's sister, Little River 110 and noted it was the smallest 4-6-2 ever built.

Does anyone have the specs on Little River 110? I would like to compare them with those for three other small Pacifics, Estado Ferro Dona Thereza Christina Nos. 50, 51 and 52. No. 50 is shown here at the famous "Railroad of Death" - the Maderia-Mamore in September of 1984.

Cheers,
Jack



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/19/14 15:57 by africansteam.






Date: 12/19/14 10:23
Re: Mini Pacifics
Author: wabash2800

Jack:

I made that statement. I think I should have said, the smallest "standard gauge" Pacific ever built.

Victor A. Baird
http://www.erstwhilepublications.com



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/19/14 10:24 by wabash2800.



Date: 12/19/14 10:28
Re: Mini Pacifics
Author: africansteam

Victor, I am less concerned as to which qualifies for the title of Smallest Pacific than just establishing the differences.

Cheers,
Jack



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 12/19/14 10:31 by africansteam.



Date: 12/19/14 10:29
Re: Mini Pacifics
Author: HotWater

For what it's worth, it is spelled "Skookum", NOT snookums.



Date: 12/19/14 10:46
Re: Mini Pacifics
Author: trainrider47

A Baldwin 2 foot gauge Pacific, currently at the Brecon Mountain Railway in Wales might be the smallest Pacific built in the US.

Outside the US, the 15" gauge Romney, Hythe and Dymchurch Pacific's might be the smallest Pacific's built for a common carrier.

Michael Allen



Date: 12/19/14 12:03
Re: Mini Pacifics
Author: Hillcrest

Jack, the most complete specs I could find on the 110 was at steamlocomotive.com under Pacific 110...and I think the "snookums" thing might have some legs, haaahahaa...

Cheers, Dave



Date: 12/19/14 15:54
Re: Mini Pacifics
Author: africansteam

Thanks, Dave. That helps, or will once I do the conversions from metric as used on the EFDTC page.

Cheers,
Jack



Date: 12/19/14 15:58
Re: Mini Pacifics
Author: africansteam

HotWater Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> For what it's worth, it is spelled "Skookum", NOT
> snookums.

Noted and corrected, thanks.

Cheers,
Jack



Date: 12/19/14 16:47
Re: Mini Pacifics
Author: spdaylight

HotWater Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> For what it's worth, it is spelled "Skookum", NOT
> snookums.

That's right . . that's what Jack calls his wife!!

Craig
mcmrailvideos.com



Date: 12/19/14 17:50
Re: Mini Pacifics
Author: africansteam

spdaylight Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> HotWater Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > For what it's worth, it is spelled "Skookum",
> NOT
> > snookums.
>
> That's right . . that's what Jack calls his
> wife!!
>
> Craig
> mcmrailvideos.com

Dave was right. It's growing legs!

Cheers,
Jack



Date: 12/20/14 04:56
Re: Mini Pacifics
Author: MaryMcPherson

Good place to look for some comparative stats is the April, 1983, issue of Trains Magazine. A piece on the 110 was the cover article.

Mary McPherson
Dongola, IL
Diverging Clear Productions



Date: 12/20/14 07:20
Re: Mini Pacifics
Author: africansteam

MaryMcPherson Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Good place to look for some comparative stats is
> the April, 1983, issue of Trains Magazine. A
> piece on the 110 was the cover article.

Thanks, Mary!

Cheers,
Jack



[ Share Thread on Facebook ] [ Search ] [ Start a New Thread ] [ Back to Thread List ] [ <Newer ] [ Older> ] 
Page created in 0.0423 seconds