Home | Open Account | Help | 256 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Steam & Excursion > 261 + 142Date: 03/26/15 07:42 261 + 142 Author: m1bprr Date: 03/26/15 08:57 Re: 261 + 142 Author: HotWater Interesting. I always thought that the "little engine" was on the front of a doubleheader consist.
Date: 03/26/15 09:36 Re: 261 + 142 Author: TrackGuy HotWater, not to challenge your deep knowlege, but I thought it was usually conventional to have the "road" engine coupled to the train and the "helper" in front? In this case, wasn't this trip run on the NYS&W? Without looking, I think Tully, NY is on the NYS&W. In which case the 142 may have been considered the "road" engine? I may be all wet here....
TrackGuy Date: 03/26/15 09:39 Re: 261 + 142 Author: HotWater TrackGuy Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > HotWater, not to challenge your deep knowlege, but > I thought it was usually conventional to have the > "road" engine coupled to the train and the > "helper" in front? In this case, wasn't this > trip run on the NYS&W? Without looking, I think > Tully, NY is on the NYS&W. In which case the 142 > may have been considered the "road" engine? I > may be all wet here.... > > TrackGuy OK, but did this trip start out as a doubleheader? Was the 261 "added" as a helper for some steep grade enroute? Date: 03/26/15 09:48 Re: 261 + 142 Author: typebangin If I remember correctly, 261 ran a 2-day Scranton-Syracuse (and return) trip that summer. 261 pulled her train solo from Scranton to Binghamton, and met 142 somewhere just north of Binghamton. They combined the 2 trains and proceeded to Syracuse with 261 on the point.
-James Date: 03/26/15 15:19 Re: 261 + 142 Author: nycman Ed, that's "New Yawk." Or maybe LonGuyland, hey.
Date: 03/26/15 17:19 Re: 261 + 142 Author: Keystone1 HotWater....I always heard that the high drivered loco road in the rear......for a conventional doubleheader, not as a temporary helper.
Date: 03/26/15 18:37 Re: 261 + 142 Author: HotWater Keystone1 Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > HotWater....I always heard that the high drivered > loco road in the rear......for a conventional > doubleheader, not as a temporary helper. So you're saying the #142 has larger diameter drivers than #261? Date: 03/27/15 03:33 Re: 261 + 142 Author: JPB IIRC, in 1998 142 led C&O 614 between Hoboken, NJ and Port Jervis, NY on a High Iron trip.
Date: 03/27/15 04:42 Re: 261 + 142 Author: mdogg JPB Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > IIRC, in 1998 142 led C&O 614 between Hoboken, > NJ and Port Jervis, NY on a High Iron trip. Not entirely true. 142 led for PART of the trip. Date: 03/27/15 05:18 Re: 261 + 142 Author: Keystone1 HotWater...no, I'm saying that with a traditional doubleheader, say, a Pacific would be in the rear, and a Mikado as the lead of a doubleheader. High drivered engine in the rear. This is what I've heard as a makeup of a normal doubleheaded train.
|