Home | Open Account | Help | 315 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Nostalgia & History > E.K. Muller: SP "cinderblocks" ca.1955Date: 05/04/15 22:21 E.K. Muller: SP "cinderblocks" ca.1955 Author: Evan_Werkema E.K. Muller's photography in the Western Railway Museum Archives suggests that SP did a commendable job keeping the 4-8-4's assigned to the San Joaquin Daylight spic and span in 1955-56. The same could not be said of the spit and polish afforded the GS's that drew freight assignments on the same territory. It's easy to understand how those angled silver noses were better at accumulating grime than the "flat" smokebox fronts on typical freight locomotives, and likewise how certain operating practices probably didn't help matters.
I'm guessing Muller must have been friends with some of the crews on SP's San Joaquin Valley main line, or maybe firemen were generous with the smoke whenever they saw a photographer trackside. Or maybe the crew had enemies that lived in Herndon and McFarland, CA. Whatever the reason, here are a couple of grubby GS-4's stinking up the valley in late '55 and early '56. Date: 05/04/15 22:25 Re: E.K. Muller: SP "cinderblocks" ca.1955 Author: Ritzville Great looking shots!
Larry Date: 05/04/15 22:48 Re: E.K. Muller: SP "cinderblocks" ca.1955 Author: MartyBernard Evan,
You probably told us before, but what camera ans size film did he use. The clarity you pulled out of the negs at 1000 pixels wide must be fantastic at larger scales. Nice work, Marty Bernard Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/04/15 22:51 by MartyBernard. Date: 05/05/15 00:00 Re: E.K. Muller: SP "cinderblocks" ca.1955 Author: Evan_Werkema MartyBernard Wrote:
> You probably told us before, but what camera ans > size film did he use. Most of his negatives are 2.25 x 2.25 inch squares. Date: 05/05/15 03:47 Re: E.K. Muller: SP "cinderblocks" ca.1955 Author: wpdude Thanks Evan! You just made my morming. Off to work with a big smile on my face!
Date: 05/05/15 04:34 Re: E.K. Muller: SP "cinderblocks" ca.1955 Author: SCKP187 These are some super photos--I too, am impressed with the sharpness.
Brian Stevens Date: 05/05/15 05:46 Re: E.K. Muller: SP "cinderblocks" ca.1955 Author: Alexmarissa Yes, I think these locomotives looked better with the side skirting removed.
Date: 05/05/15 06:21 Re: E.K. Muller: SP "cinderblocks" ca.1955 Author: refarkas Beautiful images. Number two is my favorite. "Erupting" is the only description for the smoke pouring from the smokestack.
Bob Date: 05/05/15 06:27 Re: E.K. Muller: SP "cinderblocks" ca.1955 Author: Cajon92 Fantastic photos, thanks for sharing them with us. I really like that last shot, man what a smoke 'screen'.
~Ryan Date: 05/05/15 07:36 Re: E.K. Muller: SP "cinderblocks" ca.1955 Author: Frisco1522 He must have bribed the firemen with a cigar or something for the smoke display. It makes a helluva display, but has to be intentional.
Imagine doing that today in CA. Using all that water and then producing that smoke. Oh the humanities. Great photos and extremely good for 2-1/4 sq. negs. Date: 05/05/15 11:26 Re: E.K. Muller: SP "cinderblocks" ca.1955 Author: dlbowen Thanks Evan for these great images! No subsitute for bigger negative size, all things being equal.
Don Bowen Saint Helena, CA Date: 05/05/15 15:53 Re: E.K. Muller: SP "cinderblocks" ca.1955 Author: nycman Maybe Rolliflex? Hasselblad? Great unaffordable cameras back then.
Date: 05/05/15 21:02 Re: E.K. Muller: SP "cinderblocks" ca.1955 Author: The_Chief_Way Those are top-drawer! Its easy to realize why the end of steam turned off many railfans !
Date: 05/10/15 05:03 Re: E.K. Muller: SP "cinderblocks" ca.1955 Author: PatternOfFailure Frisco1522 Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > He must have bribed the firemen with a cigar or > something for the smoke display. It makes a > helluva display, but has to be intentional. > Imagine doing that today in CA. Using all that > water and then producing that smoke. Oh the > humanities. You of all people should know how strongly that was frowned-upon even back then. |