| Home | Open Account | Help | 315 users online |
|
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Nostalgia & History > The Next Merger???Date: 11/23/15 11:48 The Next Merger??? Author: MartyBernard If CP can't get NS maybe UP will. Photo taken in Kansas City on January 21, 1995 of NS C36-7 8722 and UP C40-8 9028.
 Date: 11/23/15 13:05 Re: The Next Merger??? Author: PHall Yeah, good luck on that one. Getting approvals from the FRA, FTC and the DOJ would be difficult to say the least.
Date: 11/23/15 13:33 Re: The Next Merger??? Author: 3rdswitch Besides that, if NS is going to merge with anyone it should be BNSF ;-)
JB Date: 11/23/15 13:34 Re: The Next Merger??? Author: rsanchez The UP has bigger problems with declining traffic and can't take on the decline of the Appalachian coal traffic too.
Date: 11/23/15 15:18 Re: The Next Merger??? Author: 41 Oh no no no! No more mergers!
Date: 11/23/15 18:00 Re: The Next Merger??? Author: PCCRNSEngr NS can't merge with the UP since it doesn't have Pacific in its name.
Date: 11/23/15 18:03 Re: The Next Merger??? Author: SpeederDriver PCCRNSEngr Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > NS can't merge with the UP since it doesn't have > Pacific in its name. I donno... you could do a BNSF and get PUNS (Yuk, Yuk). Date: 11/23/15 18:15 Re: The Next Merger??? Author: MartyBernard SpeederDriver Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > PCCRNSEngr Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > NS can't merge with the UP since it doesn't > have > > Pacific in its name. > > I donno... you could do a BNSF and get PUNS > (Yuk, Yuk). No, that would be BUNS! Date: 11/23/15 19:12 Re: The Next Merger??? Author: ARandall70 at least if there were a UP+NS merger is that they could call it Southern Pacific!
Date: 11/24/15 05:08 Re: The Next Merger??? Author: rrartist Nnnnnnoooooooooooooo!!!!!
Posted from iPhone |