Home | Open Account | Help | 377 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Canadian Railroads > Proposed CP-CSX Merger, Oil to EastDate: 10/12/14 15:05 Proposed CP-CSX Merger, Oil to East Author: wmshawk Late Sunday Wall Street Journal indicates CP approached CSX about the possibility. US Anti-Trust Implications? Previous CN-BNSF Nixed.
Date: 10/12/14 16:51 Re: Proposed CP-CSX Merger, Oil to East Author: SpeederDriver That would make Vancouver a big port!!
eastern US w/out Chicago mess? Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/12/14 16:56 by SpeederDriver. Date: 10/12/14 18:55 Re: Proposed CP-CSX Merger, Oil to East Author: DrLoco I though I read somewhere that EHH wanted to be the one to "topple the domino" that started the final round of mergers...I guess this makes sense to try to make CP as CN-esque as possible when it comes to route miles and area served. I'll believe it when I see it...
Here's an article from thnewspaper... http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2014/10/12/canadian-pacific-railway-and-csx-could-possibly-unite/17156179/ Date: 10/13/14 05:54 Re: Proposed CP-CSX Merger, Oil to East Author: navy5717th If this merger trend continues on its current trajectory, soon North America will have:
The Railroad The Airline The Supermarket The Oil Company The Coal Company The (enter whatever you want here) and it'll all be owned by Tim Hortons Fritz in HSV, AL Date: 10/13/14 16:03 Re: Proposed CP-CSX Merger, Oil to East Author: greasemonkey CPSX, here we come.....
Date: 10/13/14 16:11 Re: Proposed CP-CSX Merger, Oil to East Author: LKeithR greasemonkey Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > CPSX, here we come..... Probably pretty close...CPSux.... Keith Robertson Langley, BC Date: 10/13/14 18:17 Re: Proposed CP-CSX Merger, Oil to East Author: fbe In the old days railroad barrons wanted to be the biggest through asset growth and traffic increases. Now railroad barrons want to be the largest through acquisition and abandonment.
Posted from Windows Phone OS 7 Date: 10/14/14 08:45 Re: Proposed CP-CSX Merger, Oil to East Author: SOO6617 fbe Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > In the old days railroad barrons wanted to be the > biggest through asset growth and traffic > increases. Now railroad barrons want to be the > largest through acquisition and abandonment. > > Posted from Windows Phone OS 7 I don't think that is true; J.J. Hill bought control of the Northern Pacific and CB&Q, E. H. Harriman bought control of the Southern Pacific, The Van Swearingen brothers started with the Nickle Plate, then bought control of the Wheeling & Lake Erie, The Erie, and the Chesapeake & Ohio. Jay Gould controlled the Union Pacific, the Missouri Pacific, the D&RGW, the Wabash, and the Erie, not all at the same time. George Gould(Jay's son) controlled the Western Pacific, the D&RGW, the Missouri Pacific, the Wabash, the W&LE, and the P&WV, nearly completing a transcontinental system. Date: 10/14/14 14:57 Re: Proposed CP-CSX Merger, Oil to East Author: fbe SOO6617,
Yes, that is true, buy more to increase the size of the asset. Nowdays they buy another line and start throwing away components to make the final road lean and mean no matter how many customers are cast aside. Posted from Windows Phone OS 7 Date: 10/14/14 16:49 Re: Proposed CP-CSX Merger, Oil to East Author: NYC6001 I think the dynamics have changed since the 1970s. CP and CSX don't overlap very much at all, and where they do, they need the extra capacity. It isn't like the CNW buying the CGW.
Date: 10/15/14 10:34 Re: Proposed CP-CSX Merger, Oil to East Author: joemvcnj Would CP be the "fallen flag" ?
Date: 10/15/14 13:40 Re: Proposed CP-CSX Merger, Oil to East Author: SOO6617 joemvcnj Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Would CP be the "fallen flag" ? CSX isn't worth enough to be the surviving company. CP has the greater book value now. |