Home | Open Account | Help | 291 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Eastern Railroad Discussion > F Tower ClosureDate: 03/27/15 04:12 F Tower Closure Author: 1 C S X T R A N S P O R T A T I O N
GREAT LAKES DIVISION MARCH 23, 2015 WILLARD DIST BULLETINS DIVISION BULLETIN 303 TO: T&E CREWS AND ALL CONCERNED SUBJECT: TIMETABLE CHANGES EFFECTIVE: 0900HRS, MARCH 30, 2015 ITEM 1 - TIMETABLE CHANGES SUBDIVISION: FOSTORIA (FS) THAT PORTION OF THE GREAT LAKES DIVISION TIMETABLE NO. 6.1, FOSTORIA SUBDIVISION , EFFECTIVE FRIDAY, APRIL 15, 2011 AT 0001 HOURS AND RULES CONVERSION JANUARY 1, 2014 IS CHANGED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 1. CHANGES IN OPERATION OF THE FOSTORIA SUBDIVISION A. THE FOSTORIA SUBDIVISION IS CONTROLLED BY THE 'IP' TRAIN DISPATCHER. B. PAGE 37 - NOTES 1 AND 2 IN THE STATION PAGE NOTES SECTION ARE REMOVED. ISSUED BY DIVISION MANAGER T.S. CONNER Date: 03/27/15 04:49 Re: F Tower Closure Author: joeygooganelli Unless they significantly rearrange the Great lakes desks, it won't work.
Joe Date: 03/27/15 05:27 Re: F Tower Closure Author: mbrotzman Untill the interior is cleaned out, F Tower isn't closed, it's simply un-staffed or open "As Needed". HAROLD tower has been in this same sort of limbo for 20 years now.
Date: 03/27/15 05:44 Re: F Tower Closure Author: toledopatch Am I reading this correctly, that the "F" Tower closing has been put off until April 15?
Date: 03/27/15 06:23 Re: F Tower Closure Author: skrambo I believe the April 15 date referred to 2011.
Date: 03/27/15 06:24 Re: F Tower Closure Author: espeefan The IP dispatcher has enough on their plate now add F tower to the equation! It's gonna be ugly!!
WHEN it fails, I hope they terminate all those involved! They want to save money cut more unnessesary office jobs in Jackwagonville! Wall Street even said they are still top heavy! Date: 03/27/15 06:38 Re: F Tower Closure Author: toledopatch skrambo Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > I believe the April 15 date referred to 2011. Aha. Reading this again, you are absolutely right. Date: 03/27/15 07:53 Re: F Tower Closure Author: mbrotzman espeefan Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > The IP dispatcher has enough on their plate now > add F tower to the equation! It's gonna be > ugly!! > WHEN it fails, I hope they terminate all those > involved! They want to save money cut more > unnessesary office jobs in Jackwagonville! Wall > Street even said they are still top heavy! Since the "closure" is reversible this could be a means to shake down NS (if they bear the brunt of the delays). Date: 03/27/15 08:11 Re: F Tower Closure Author: farmer M&W has been told no track time on Willard sub March 30,31 and April 1 so the changeover goes smoothly. Will make things interesting with every other day inspections.
Posted from iPhone Date: 03/27/15 09:46 Re: F Tower Closure Author: RRNUT Once again railroad management put out a procedure "no track time for 3 concective days" that goes against policy "track repair and inspection". Hope a broken rail doesnt come up at wrong time???
Posted from Android Date: 03/27/15 09:55 Re: F Tower Closure Author: EL-SD45-3632 RRNUT Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Once again railroad management put out a procedure > "no track time for 3 concective days" that goes > against policy "track repair and inspection". > Hope a broken rail doesnt come up at wrong time??? > > > Posted from Android A broken rail is a little different than track time for simple maintenance. Date: 03/27/15 12:20 Re: F Tower Closure Author: halfmoonharold April 15, 2011 was the date the timetable was effective.
Date: 03/27/15 17:05 Re: F Tower Closure Author: RRNUT Well...im sure farmer would agree that track inspection is a good part of daily maintenance. Finding track defects keep the bad stuff away.
Posted from Android Date: 03/27/15 18:28 Re: F Tower Closure Author: toledopatch halfmoonharold Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > April 15, 2011 was the date the timetable was > effective. Yeah, I overlooked the year in that part of the bulletin.... |