Home Open Account Help 287 users online

Model Railroading > and you thought a DD40 was big


Date: 10/27/14 23:00
and you thought a DD40 was big
Author: pmack

How about a double DD40? times 3?
http://www.trainmaster.ch/WML-11.htm



Date: 10/27/14 23:24
Re: and you thought a DD40 was big
Author: BigDave

Can you imagine the minimum radius needed to run those monsters?

I liked the UP 007, too.



Date: 10/28/14 00:37
Re: and you thought a DD40 was big
Author: trkspd

I've always loved double D's, but I'm afraid that quadruple D's are too much to handle...even for a man like me.



Kick em!

Posted from Android



Date: 10/28/14 02:08
Re: and you thought a DD40 was big
Author: jobrazy

Great for straight lines!

Joel Brazy
Coatesville, PA



Date: 10/28/14 04:04
Re: and you thought a DD40 was big
Author: bigmc83

One fuel tank feeding four prime movers...Half of the train would be fuel tenders!

-Sean



Date: 10/28/14 04:53
Re: and you thought a DD40 was big
Author: pal77

bigmc83 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> One fuel tank feeding four prime movers...Half of
> the train would be fuel tenders!
>
> -Sean

Check again only 2 turbo stacks only 2 prime movers lots of cooling though



Date: 10/28/14 07:30
Re: and you thought a DD40 was big
Author: funnelfan

pal77 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Check again only 2 turbo stacks only 2 prime
> movers lots of cooling though

Actually it could still work like shown, just that second prime mover would be tucked under the forward part of the radiator and each pair of prime movers would need to share the same exhaust port and auxiliary equipment. You could have the drive shafts of each pair prime movers hooked together. I'm just not sure where a second generator could go.

Ted Curphey
Ontario, OR



Date: 10/28/14 07:30
Re: and you thought a DD40 was big
Author: rapidotrains

That is completely awesome! Wow!

-Jason



Date: 10/28/14 08:50
Re: and you thought a DD40 was big
Author: wabash2800

59 centimeters is almost 2 feet (23.23 inches).



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/28/14 09:51 by wabash2800.



Date: 10/28/14 11:10
Re: and you thought a DD40 was big
Author: SPDRGWfan

pmack Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> How about a double DD40? times 3?
> http://www.trainmaster.ch/WML-11.htm

It looks like a photoshop job done on a photo of a DD40 but its real eh..

All I can say he sure has a conversation piece, but good luck finding a place to run those - especially in Germany where they have far less room for layouts and large radius curves than we have here in the US. I expect those models will spend their lives on shelves being talked about mostly. All I can do is shake my head!

Cheers, Jim Fitch



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 10/28/14 11:12 by SPDRGWfan.



Date: 10/28/14 11:19
Re: and you thought a DD40 was big
Author: EL-SD45-3632

trkspd Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I've always loved double D's, but I'm afraid that
> quadruple D's are too much to handle...even for a
> man like me.
>
>
>
> Kick em!
>
> Posted from Android


The Dolly Pardon of Locomotives!



Date: 10/30/14 17:23
Re: and you thought a DD40 was big
Author: onequiknova

If I'm reading it correctly, he says he used Genesis units, but those are obviously Bachmann. That ABA set would have cost a small fortune to build with Genesis units.



[ Share Thread on Facebook ] [ Search ] [ Start a New Thread ] [ Back to Thread List ] [ <Newer ] [ Older> ] 
Page created in 0.0372 seconds