Home | Open Account | Help | 287 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Model Railroading > and you thought a DD40 was bigDate: 10/27/14 23:00 and you thought a DD40 was big Author: pmack How about a double DD40? times 3?
http://www.trainmaster.ch/WML-11.htm Date: 10/27/14 23:24 Re: and you thought a DD40 was big Author: BigDave Can you imagine the minimum radius needed to run those monsters?
I liked the UP 007, too. Date: 10/28/14 00:37 Re: and you thought a DD40 was big Author: trkspd I've always loved double D's, but I'm afraid that quadruple D's are too much to handle...even for a man like me.
Kick em! Posted from Android Date: 10/28/14 02:08 Re: and you thought a DD40 was big Author: jobrazy Great for straight lines!
Joel Brazy Coatesville, PA Date: 10/28/14 04:04 Re: and you thought a DD40 was big Author: bigmc83 One fuel tank feeding four prime movers...Half of the train would be fuel tenders!
-Sean Date: 10/28/14 04:53 Re: and you thought a DD40 was big Author: pal77 bigmc83 Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > One fuel tank feeding four prime movers...Half of > the train would be fuel tenders! > > -Sean Check again only 2 turbo stacks only 2 prime movers lots of cooling though Date: 10/28/14 07:30 Re: and you thought a DD40 was big Author: funnelfan pal77 Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Check again only 2 turbo stacks only 2 prime > movers lots of cooling though Actually it could still work like shown, just that second prime mover would be tucked under the forward part of the radiator and each pair of prime movers would need to share the same exhaust port and auxiliary equipment. You could have the drive shafts of each pair prime movers hooked together. I'm just not sure where a second generator could go. Ted Curphey Ontario, OR Date: 10/28/14 07:30 Re: and you thought a DD40 was big Author: rapidotrains That is completely awesome! Wow!
-Jason Date: 10/28/14 08:50 Re: and you thought a DD40 was big Author: wabash2800 59 centimeters is almost 2 feet (23.23 inches).
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/28/14 09:51 by wabash2800. Date: 10/28/14 11:10 Re: and you thought a DD40 was big Author: SPDRGWfan pmack Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > How about a double DD40? times 3? > http://www.trainmaster.ch/WML-11.htm It looks like a photoshop job done on a photo of a DD40 but its real eh.. All I can say he sure has a conversation piece, but good luck finding a place to run those - especially in Germany where they have far less room for layouts and large radius curves than we have here in the US. I expect those models will spend their lives on shelves being talked about mostly. All I can do is shake my head! Cheers, Jim Fitch Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 10/28/14 11:12 by SPDRGWfan. Date: 10/28/14 11:19 Re: and you thought a DD40 was big Author: EL-SD45-3632 trkspd Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > I've always loved double D's, but I'm afraid that > quadruple D's are too much to handle...even for a > man like me. > > > > Kick em! > > Posted from Android The Dolly Pardon of Locomotives! Date: 10/30/14 17:23 Re: and you thought a DD40 was big Author: onequiknova If I'm reading it correctly, he says he used Genesis units, but those are obviously Bachmann. That ABA set would have cost a small fortune to build with Genesis units.
|