| Home | Open Account | Help | 356 users online |
|
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Nostalgia & History > Tunnel Motor Tuesday, SSW . . .Date: 03/03/26 10:40 Tunnel Motor Tuesday, SSW . . . Author: 3rdswitch . . . in APR '87, the eastbound loaded oil cans were topping the grade at Vincent *changed, CA, (near Palmdale) on SP's Saugus line with eleven of thirteen units powering this train tunnel motors.
JB Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/03/26 13:21 by 3rdswitch. Date: 03/03/26 10:48 Re: Tunnel Motor Tuesday, SSW . . . Author: Railfan4Christ Great catch, and it looks like they are all running, which is a bonus.
Tom Date: 03/03/26 11:35 Re: Tunnel Motor Tuesday, SSW . . . Author: AZSP Railfan4Christ Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Great catch, and it looks like they are all > running, which is a bonus. > > Tom Weren’t the loaded cans something in the neighborhood of 13,000 tons? Awesome sight to see and hear! Posted from iPhone Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 03/03/26 11:36 by AZSP. Date: 03/03/26 11:46 Re: Tunnel Motor Tuesday, SSW . . . Author: jgilmore Nice, definitely got motors there...
JG Date: 03/03/26 11:46 Re: Tunnel Motor Tuesday, SSW . . . Author: Gordon1950 That is not Ravenna, that is Vincent.
Date: 03/03/26 13:02 Re: Tunnel Motor Tuesday, SSW . . . Author: ProAmtrak Cool shots, suprirsed the head end had 7 units, usually it's 5X6, then when it got longer a few years later SP decided to go 4X5!
Date: 03/03/26 15:20 Re: Tunnel Motor Tuesday, SSW . . . Author: tehachcond AZSP Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Railfan4Christ Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Great catch, and it looks like they are all > > running, which is a bonus. > > > > Tom > > Weren’t the loaded cans something in the > neighborhood of 13,000 tons? Awesome sight to > see and hear! > > Posted from iPhone No. the train was a bit less than 10,000 tons. Former oil can conductor here. That power would handle the train up the Tehachapi grade about 13 MPH. Brian Black Castle Rock, CO Date: 03/04/26 17:42 Re: Tunnel Motor Tuesday, SSW . . . Author: AZSP tehachcond Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > AZSP Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Railfan4Christ Wrote: > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > ----- > > > Great catch, and it looks like they are all > > > running, which is a bonus. > > > > > > Tom > > > > Weren’t the loaded cans something in the > > neighborhood of 13,000 tons? Awesome sight to > > see and hear! > > > > Posted from iPhone > > No. the train was a bit less than 10,000 tons. > Former oil can conductor here. That power would > handle the train up the Tehachapi grade about 13 > MPH. > > Brian Black > Castle Rock, CO Thanks Brian, I may have been thinking of the coal train tonnage. There were several different ones over the years, but in the early 80’s there was one that was the heaviest train on the hill. |