| Home | Open Account | Help | 298 users online |
|
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Canadian Railroads > Feds in for $117M on Churchill lineDate: 09/14/18 14:10 Feds in for $117M on Churchill line Author: thehighwayman They say repair work has already started ...
https://www.thespec.com/news-story/8901484-ottawa-puts-up-117m-to-restore-northern-rail-line/ Will MacKenzie Dundas, ON Date: 09/14/18 16:40 Re: Feds in for $117M on Churchill line Author: joemvcnj About time.
Date: 09/14/18 16:43 Re: Feds in for $117M on Churchill line Author: CA_Sou_MA_Agent Funny how the Government is willing cough up some money to repair the line ----- just as soon as OmniTrax has packed its bags and left town.
Date: 09/14/18 20:48 Re: Feds in for $117M on Churchill line Author: thehighwayman CA_Sou_MA_Agent Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Funny how the Government is willing cough up some > money to repair the line ----- just as soon as > OmniTrax has packed its bags and left town. Omnitrax should have been ridden out on a rail .... Will MacKenzie Dundas, ON Date: 09/16/18 02:29 Re: Feds in for $117M on Churchill line Author: CA_Sou_MA_Agent thehighwayman Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Omnitrax should have been ridden out on a rail That may be. The irony I was trying to point out, however, was that the Government seemed unwilling to step in and participate in any way in paying for the repairs. They're being inconsistent. If you're going to remain on the sidelines and not partcipate when OmniTrax is on the scene, shouldn't you, likewise, maintain that same stance when OmniTrax is no longer on the scene? For the sake of principle and consistency, if nothing else? Date: 09/16/18 06:21 Re: Feds in for $117M on Churchill line Author: PHall CA_Sou_MA_Agent Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > thehighwayman Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Omnitrax should have been ridden out on a rail > > That may be. The irony I was trying to point > out, however, was that the Government seemed > unwilling to step in and participate in any way in > paying for the repairs. They're being > inconsistent. If you're going to remain on the > sidelines and not partcipate when OmniTrax is on > the scene, shouldn't you, likewise, maintain that > same stance when OmniTrax is no longer on the > scene? > > For the sake of principle and consistency, if > nothing else? > They wanted OmniTrax to actually live up to their contract. Date: 09/16/18 06:29 Re: Feds in for $117M on Churchill line Author: dan the port has no customers?
|