Home | Open Account | Help | 308 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Canadian Railroads > CN 9903Date: 11/02/19 17:54 CN 9903 Author: refarkas CN 9903 was photographed on October 12, 1988. I have Pickering Junction, Ontario as the location, but I am no longer certain.
Bob Date: 11/02/19 17:58 Re: CN 9903 Author: M-420 Solid shot, but I wish the trailing M-420 was on the point!
Date: 11/02/19 18:56 Re: CN 9903 Author: 4489 It has to be close to Pickering based on the high tension wires in the background more than likely from Pickering Generating Station (Nuclear)
Date: 11/02/19 20:07 Re: CN 9903 Author: moonliter Very good...we were just talking about CN and SD50s. See hoggerdoug's post.
Gerry Gaugl Ottawa ON Date: 11/03/19 08:03 Re: CN 9903 Author: 4489 moonliter Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Very good...we were just talking about CN and > SD50s. See hoggerdoug's post. > > Gerry Gaugl > Ottawa ON I thought that these were in fact -60's. Even though their builders plates state -50's? Date: 11/03/19 11:44 Re: CN 9903 Author: hoggerdoug I did a google and here is one of the results.
https://www.trainorders.com/discussion/read.php?15,4649648 Doug Date: 11/03/19 15:06 Re: CN 9903 Author: PHall Well a SD50 has a EMD 645 engine in it and while a SD60 has a EMD 710 engine.
So which engine is inside these beasts? Date: 11/03/19 18:05 Re: CN 9903 Author: moonliter PHall Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Well a SD50 has a EMD 645 engine in it and while a > SD60 has a EMD 710 engine. > So which engine is inside these beasts? krm152 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > This is a very confusing unit. According to > Wikjipedia, #5503 is a pre-production SD60F, > originally classified as SD50AF and built as CN > 9903. It looks like an SD50F, but internally is an > SD60F. > Hope this clears it up. > ALLEN feclark wrote: >>To chip in, I checked the Canadian Trackside Guide 2014 (nearest one to hand) and 5500-5503, former 9900-9903, were designated SD50AF >>when built, but are now SD60F. I guess it's what's under the hood, or in this case the cowl, that counts. My answer to PHall's question. Because of the hybrid nature of 9900-9903 they were designated SD50AF/SD60F. They have 16-710G3 engines. Gerry Gaugl Ottawa ON Date: 11/03/19 19:14 Re: CN 9903 Author: PHall moonliter Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > PHall Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Well a SD50 has a EMD 645 engine in it and while > a > > SD60 has a EMD 710 engine. > > So which engine is inside these beasts? > > krm152 Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > This is a very confusing unit. According to > > Wikjipedia, #5503 is a pre-production SD60F, > > originally classified as SD50AF and built as CN > > > 9903. It looks like an SD50F, but internally is > an > > SD60F. > > Hope this clears it up. > > ALLEN > feclark wrote: > >>To chip in, I checked the Canadian Trackside > Guide 2014 (nearest one to hand) and 5500-5503, > former 9900-9903, were designated SD50AF >>when > built, but are now SD60F. I guess it's what's > under the hood, or in this case the cowl, that > counts. > > My answer to PHall's question. Because of the > hybrid nature of 9900-9903 they were designated > SD50AF/SD60F. They have 16-710G3 engines. > > Gerry Gaugl > Ottawa ON > Wouldn't that make them SD60's? |