Home | Open Account | Help | 244 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Eastern Railroad Discussion > Are there less intermodal trains on the Albany Div?Date: 02/09/18 16:28 Are there less intermodal trains on the Albany Div? Author: twropr Back in Aug. 1999, shortly after CSX took over Conrail, the following van symbols operated:
RL= NJ Terminal on the River Line CHI= Chicago area ramp ESL= Rose Lake, IL ramp Q115 BOS-ESTL Q117 BOS-CHI Q119 BOS-CHI Q167 WOR-CHI Q116 ESL-BOS Q109 RL-CHI Q157 RL-CHI Q159 Dewitt-CHI Q161 RL-CHI Q169 RL-CHI Q110 CHI-RL Q112 CHI-RL Q150 CHI-RL Q152 CHI-RL Q158 CHI-RL Q160 CHI-RL Q162 CHI-RL Q164 CHI-RL 18 trains/weekday except for Sun.-Mon. From what I hear on the Mohawk radio stream I don't think any where near this many vans are running between Selkirk and Buffalo today. Seeing the way Amtrak loses time following 15,000-ton land cruisers, I can't help but believe that the vans are also being slowed down by the drag freights. Could it be that CSX's hesitation to pay maintainers to work switches at non-strategic locations during the winter, forcing everybody into a single file march, has caused velocity to decrease to the point where NS is getting more of the east-west business? Andy Date: 02/09/18 17:55 Re: Are there less intermodal trains on the Albany Div? Author: RiverLineProductions Now you've got:
Q001 (Tue) RL Q002 (Thu) RL Q003 RL Q004 RL Q007 BOS Q008 Syracuse/RL Q009 RL Q010 RL Q012 BOS only Q017 BOS Q019 BOS only Q020 BOS Q022 BOS Q159 RL Q160 RL Q161 RL Q162 RL Q163 RL Q272 RL ** Odd is towards Buffalo, even is towards Selkirk, Jersey, Worcester Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 02/09/18 17:56 by RiverLineProductions. |