Home | Open Account | Help | 303 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Passenger Trains > Amtrak Phase VI vs VII - Why?Date: 02/05/23 17:52 Amtrak Phase VI vs VII - Why? Author: weatherdawg I know this is certainly low on the scale of importance, especially compared to equipment availability, on-time performance, and rider experience, but it's something that still is a cost to Amtrak. Between the 50th anniversary and the order for the ALC-42s, a new paint scheme was announced (Phase VI). P42 108 and the first gaggle of Chargers were in this scheme, but then somewhere around 310 a "Phase VII" scheme showed up. Is there any backstory to the change? It certainly seems like an odd change, especially given the budgetary concerns of Amtrak.
Date: 02/05/23 18:33 Re: Amtrak Phase VI vs VII - Why? Author: sethamtrak It was always planned that way. 300-309 in phase VI (exception of 301 in day-1) and 310 beyond is in the new livery phase VII.
Date: 02/05/23 22:28 Re: Amtrak Phase VI vs VII - Why? Author: WP17 sethamtrak Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > It was always planned that way. 300-309 in phase > VI (exception of 301 in day-1) and 310 beyond is > in the new livery phase VII. yep everyone knows that when your corporate s**t is hitting the fan, the right thing to do is come up with a new livery. That will fix everything wrong with the organization. WP17 Date: 02/05/23 22:31 Re: Amtrak Phase VI vs VII - Why? Author: cabsignaldrop It certainly worked for the Rock Island! Oh wait...
WP17 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > sethamtrak Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > It was always planned that way. 300-309 in > phase > > VI (exception of 301 in day-1) and 310 beyond > is > > in the new livery phase VII. > > yep everyone knows that when your corporate s**t > is hitting the fan, the right thing to do is come > up with a new livery. That will fix everything > wrong with the organization. > > WP17 Posted from Android Date: 02/05/23 23:09 Re: Amtrak Phase VI vs VII - Why? Author: TomG Well for whatever reason for the change, your really not going to see a financial change just because they changed the scheme. Part of the cost of the locomotive is paint. Prep, primer and x number gallons of paint. The VII paint is actually a bit less labor intensive, less masking, but like I said its all included in the cost. Now if they repaint the newly painted phase VI units, that is a real cost. Same goes for repainting the GEs providing they are scheduled for paint anyway.
Date: 02/06/23 07:12 Re: Amtrak Phase VI vs VII - Why? Author: weatherdawg I'd imagine there's at least some cost somewhere (design firm?) for the scheme. Mainly, I was just curious as to why the change occurred, especially given how long Phase V has lasted.
Date: 02/06/23 07:15 Re: Amtrak Phase VI vs VII - Why? Author: longliveSP The search function works great. There was an in-depth discussion including links to relevant websites containing the full explanation.
Date: 02/06/23 07:48 Re: Amtrak Phase VI vs VII - Why? Author: weatherdawg Yes it does! However, it also requires discussion beyond just a link to a video, which was about all that came out of the first round of discussion. I didn't catch that Donnelly was in that video providing the relevant info: Phase VII was the plan all along but was not finalized in time for the initial deliveries. So instead a "Phase VI" was quickly developed for the 9 ALCs (and the P42).
Now the answer is even easier to find in search 🙂 Date: 02/06/23 12:55 Re: Amtrak Phase VI vs VII - Why? Author: RRBMail > yep everyone knows that when your corporate s**t
> is hitting the fan, the right thing to do is come > up with a new livery. That will fix everything > wrong with the organization. > > WP17 Look at The Rock. |