| Home | Open Account | Help | 445 users online |
|
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Passenger Trains > Info on no. 6(29) on Sunday delay?Date: 08/31/26 06:38 Info on no. 6(29) on Sunday delay? Author: bmarti7 The CZ had a major delay Sunday between Glenwood Springs and Granby. Any information?
BB Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 08/31/26 07:58 by bmarti7. Date: 08/31/26 06:54 Re: Info on no. 5(29) on Sunday delay? Author: mbrotzman I assume you mean 6? A boulder fell onto the track somewhere in that stretch. Around 4pm the decision was made to return the train to Glenwood so that passengers could get out and stretch their legs. The boulder was cleared around 9pm.
I was in Denver this weekend after my own trip on 6(27). Arrived early at Denver after a largely uneventful trip. Date: 08/31/26 18:58 Re: Info on no. 5(29) on Sunday delay? Author: OgdenBob 5 was over 2 hours late getting into SLC last night 8/30/26. Anyone know anything about that? Same rock maybe?
Date: 09/01/26 04:44 Re: Info on no. 5(29) on Sunday delay? Author: mbrotzman OgdenBob Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > 5 was over 2 hours late getting into SLC last > night 8/30/26. Anyone know anything about that? > Same rock maybe? From friends traveling earlier in the week through freight on the line is causing 1-2 hour delays, but this is generally made up in the padding. Lots of that area still uses DRGW era signaling and a bunch of the sidings are out of service so a signaling failure might create a sizable single track segment. Date: 09/01/26 12:42 Re: Info on no. 5(29) on Sunday delay? Author: illini73 mbrotzman Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > . . . Lots of that area still uses DRGW era signaling . . . and it would be nice if they still used Rio Grande-era anticipatory rockfall management, too. Boulders above the tracks were pre-emptively dynamited before they could fall on tbe right-of-way. |