Home | Open Account | Help | 380 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Railfan Technology > Radio review reportDate: 01/29/25 13:19 Radio review report Author: WW I have not updated my radio testing reviews for a couple of months or more—mostly because I haven’t had much positive to report. In this interim I have tested several of the low- to mid-priced “Chinese” radios. The performance of all of them, with one exception, has been markedly substandard. More about that exception in a minute. As it stands, the Quansheng UV-K5(8) (and its numerous essentially identical brand-name and model variants) is still the low-priced winner in the railfan portable radio market. Especially when the aftermarket (but free) Egzumer 0.22 or related “NuNu” firmware is loaded into the radio, the UV-K5(8) has flat-out the best overall performance in the low-price market and will, in fact, outperform many amateur and commercial portable radios costing hundreds of dollars more. Its performance is so good that my Uniden BC-125AT and BCD-160DN scanners have sat in my radio drawer with the batteries removed for months now.
So, about the “exception” radio that I tested. It is the BTech BF-F8HP Pro radio. BTech is a South Dakota company that imports Bao Feng radios from China that have been built and/or modified to BTech’s specs. Unlike most of the Chinese radio companies, BTech actually has very decent U.S.-based customer support that is both responsive and knowledgeable. When I e-mailed them a technical question, they responded to me within a few hours. BTech also provides periodic firmware updates to the BF-F8HP Pro. Overall, the BF-F8HP Pro is a fairly decent radio, priced at about $60. Unfortunately, its weak spot is its poor weak signal reception. It is not awful, but the Quansheng UV-K5(8) will run circles around it, and costs about one-third as much. As such, I can’t put the BF-F8HP Pro on my recommended list. That’s too bad, because the BF-F8HP Pro has 999 memory channels, a decent keyboard and display, good audio, and is relatively logical to operate. BTech says that there is a firmware update coming at some point to address a couple of small issues with the radio. I hope that the firmware update might address its lack of weak signal reception, but that may be a hardware issue that can’t be fixed. I will briefly mention one other radio that I’ve reviewed before—the Tidradio TD-H3. This radio is also not on my recommended list because of several shortcomings in its “out-of-the-box” form. That said, there is a free aftermarket firmware update from “nicsure” that actually cures many of the TD-H3’s deficiencies and turns it into a darned good railfanning radio. Unfortunately, the firmware is hard to find and often hard to install, even for experienced radio users. It also has a “deal-killer” bug in the nicsure firmware that will allow the user to inadvertently and unknowingly alter the frequency of a memory channel while one is adding or deleting a memory channel from the scan list. If and when those firmware deficiencies are cured, this radio might approach the desirability of the Quansheng UV-K5(8). Until then, I don’t recommend the TD-H3, notwithstanding some of the accolades that it gets from the amateur radio community. As always, I will try to answer questions. At this time, I have no current plans for further radio reviews, unless some new and interesting products come down the pipeline. |