Home | Open Account | Help | 260 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Western Railroad Discussion > Not good for the A&M...two trains collideDate: 10/16/14 10:33 Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: theironhorse http://www.nwahomepage.com/fulltext-news/d/story/new-info-freight-train-collides-with-passenger-tra/40804/AwdwSSJx7E-fjiB-Y_oV2w
The Iron Horse Date: 10/16/14 10:37 Re: Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: rev66vette Ouch! As one who ran many a fall excursion, this is the one thing that is dreaded the most.
Date: 10/16/14 11:00 Re: Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: Margaret_SP_fan From the article, "According to those officials
on the scene, a total of 44 people were on both trains. Several were injured, but they say five of those people are in critical condition." That is just awful. My heart goes out to all those injured and to their families and friends. EDIT: This is a completely different accident than the one that was reported here previously, in which a freight train pulling 98 cars derailed when it ran over a wash-out: http://www.trainorders.com/discussion/read.php?1,3549624 According to the TV news coverage, the engineer and fireman suffered only bumps and bruises: http://5newsonline.com/2014/10/10/conductor-engineer-hospitalized-after-train-derails-in-chester/ What an awful week for everyone on the A&M, and their passengers. Date: 10/16/14 11:26 Re: Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: trkspd Interested to see how exactly this was able to happen.
I wonder if this marks the end for A&M? Posted from Android Date: 10/16/14 12:07 Re: Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: mopac1978 Typical sloppy news media coverage as usual. When did this occur? Today (Thurs.)? Yesterday?
Date: 10/16/14 12:18 Re: Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: Rathole Just a few hours ago.
Date: 10/16/14 12:26 Re: Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: Realist Watch what happens to excursion liability insurance costs.
Date: 10/16/14 12:27 Re: Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: zephyrus mopac1978 Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Typical sloppy news media coverage as usual. When > did this occur? Today (Thurs.)? Yesterday? The original post time / date is right at the top. Date: 10/16/14 12:38 Re: Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: CPCoyote trkspd Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Interested to see how exactly this was able to > happen. > > I wonder if this marks the end for A&M? > > Posted from Android As would I. Do they not use radios? Fusees? Torpedoes? A Flagman? Date: 10/16/14 12:40 Re: Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: Margaret_SP_fan Rathole Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Just a few hours ago. That is odd. I did not think most RRs ran passenger excursions on weekdays after school started. Does anyone have any more details? What a terrible accident! I am very worried about the fate of the injured people. What a terrible week for the A&M. I, too, do not see how they can survive. I, too, am worried about what insurance companies will do t o liability premium rates for all other excursion operators. Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/16/14 12:46 by Margaret_SP_fan. Date: 10/16/14 12:54 Re: Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: trainjunkie CPCoyote Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > As would I. Do they not use radios? Fusees? > Torpedoes? A Flagman? You're joking, right? Date: 10/16/14 13:05 Re: Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: UPTRAIN trainjunkie Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > CPCoyote Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > As would I. Do they not use radios? Fusees? > > Torpedoes? A Flagman? > > You're joking, right? Hope they have a flagging kit on those SD70ACes. Oh wait, those probably dumped out in the river. Pump Date: 10/16/14 13:21 Re: Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: Rathole It won't be the end of the A&M, but who knows about the future of the excursions. For now though, let's keep our thoughts and prayers with the injured.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/16/14 13:56 by Rathole. Date: 10/16/14 13:23 Re: Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: Margaret_SP_fan More info --
From THV11's website: http://www.thv11.com/story/news/local/2014/10/16/passenger-train-freight-train-collide-in-northwest-arkansas/17358277/ Krista Guthrie with ADEM [Arkansas Department of Emergency Management] told THV11 that 44 people are injured, six of whom are crew members. She said five individuals are critically injured.......that left two engines and four train cars damaged in the accident." Yet more info - From NWAonline: http://www.nwaonline.com/news/2014/oct/16/authorities-respond-reported-train-wreck-washingto/ "They said two trains collided. The first train was stopped on the tracks, and a relief train sent to help hit it from the south at about 10:40 a.m. [local time: Central Time]..... There were 44 people, including passengers and crew, on both trains, Luther said. [John Luther, director of the Washington County Department of Emergency Management and Washington County] Five people suffered moderate or severe injuries, Luther said, and some others suffered minor injuries." Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/16/14 14:07 by Margaret_SP_fan. Date: 10/16/14 13:35 Re: Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: randgust Fresh news photos just posted that show the equipment involved.
Date: 10/16/14 13:42 Re: Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: sp8192 Hard to tell if the A&M 68 was leading the passenger train long hood forward, or it was the lead engine on the helper train and slammed into the coaches. From the looks of the coach truck springs on the ground, it looks like the impact moved the coaches over 2 car lengths... that's a pretty good thud!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/16/14 13:50 by sp8192. Date: 10/16/14 13:50 Re: Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: Rathole I'm under the impression (judging solely from the photo, no official information) that the passenger train got rear-ended. In addition to the springs lying on the ground, there's a lot of damage to the end of the coach in the photo. Can't see anything derailed, but it looks like the one of the engines tried to climb up or (or actually under) the other one.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/16/14 13:53 by Rathole. Date: 10/16/14 13:50 Re: Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: EMDSW-1 Realist Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Watch what happens to excursion liability > insurance costs. Don't even THINK about that one! Dick Samuels Oregon Pacific Railroad Date: 10/16/14 14:22 Re: Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: Margaret_SP_fan Date: 10/16/14 15:13 Re: Not good for the A&M...two trains collide Author: PumpkinHogger Is their method of operation TWC? If so could be a DS fail in addition to restricted speed on part of crew. NTSB will be all over this one and cast a lot if light on old equipment sharing operations with line-haul freight traffic.
You can bet the risk-assessment is already on at A&M and will be closely watched by all in the tourist industry. |