Home | Open Account | Help | 320 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Western Railroad Discussion > CRM for Class II and Class III carriers?Date: 03/31/15 18:13 CRM for Class II and Class III carriers? Author: Geep Anyone has experience or suggestions on implementing a Customer relationship management (CRM) marketing software on shortline/regional carriers?
Thank you. Date: 04/01/15 01:40 Re: CRM for Class II and Class III carriers? Author: MarsLight CRM (brand-name, Microsoft product) is complicated and very slow... Overall a burden to use and maintain. It screws with your Outlook application and is known for crashing it. Suggest you try other competing databases and see what's out there, but I wouldn't choose CRM for my company. Yes, I use it for a rail-related function.
Posted from iPhone Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/01/15 01:42 by MarsLight. Date: 04/01/15 08:45 Re: CRM for Class II and Class III carriers? Author: Waybiller We implemented three on a supplier to Class II and III railroads - salesforce.com, an internal one, and Trackweb by Softfront. I'd say it depends on what you are looking for as the main purpose of 'CRM'.
SFDC is very much oriented towards sales, and unless you're a very large railroad with hundreds of sales opportunities I wouldn't see the need. Trackweb we customized to be a call tracking system, and for that it works pretty well. Date: 04/01/15 10:22 Re: CRM for Class II and Class III carriers? Author: EtoinShrdlu >CRM (brand-name, Microsoft product) is complicated and very slow...
Maybe it confuses itself with the other CRM: Crew Resource Management. Date: 04/01/15 13:12 Re: CRM for Class II and Class III carriers? Author: jst3751 MarsLight Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > CRM (brand-name, Microsoft product) is complicated > and very slow... Overall a burden to use and > maintain. It screws with your Outlook application > and is known for crashing it. Suggest you try > other competing databases and see what's out > there, but I wouldn't choose CRM for my company. > Yes, I use it for a rail-related function. > > Posted from iPhone Of course, your mileage may vary. We have it running where I work with no problems. Complicated to set up, sure. But extremely adaptable. Date: 04/01/15 13:41 Re: CRM for Class II and Class III carriers? Author: callum_out It is complicated and adaptable, maybe useful for a Class II road but Class III? You really don't
need it for a couple dozen shippers. Out |