Home Open Account Help 244 users online

Steam & Excursion > ID needed for 2-8-0 # 6739 at Hill


Date: 04/17/19 06:45
ID needed for 2-8-0 # 6739 at Hill
Author: Baxtersta

Kentucky Railway Museum has in its collection a couple of old prints of a 2-8-0 #6739 that we are trying to identify as to railroad and location. In one of the photos, the station in the background has a "Hill" name board.  The locomotive appears to have an Alco builders plate. 
Any clues as to indentity would be appreciated.  






Date: 04/17/19 08:18
Re: ID needed for 2-8-0 # 6739 at Hill
Author: pwh

The engine has a "New York Central" look about it, if that helps?



Date: 04/17/19 08:56
Re: ID needed for 2-8-0 # 6739 at Hill
Author: CPRR

Can’t help but nice looking locomotive

Posted from iPhone



Date: 04/17/19 09:54
Re: ID needed for 2-8-0 # 6739 at Hill
Author: CPR_4000

I agree that it looks like an NYC engine, but by 1940 the 6700's were 0-6-0 switchers. I'd guess this photo to be 1920 or before?



Date: 04/17/19 09:58
Re: ID needed for 2-8-0 # 6739 at Hill
Author: ts1457

Michigan Central had a station named Hill in Michigan, but I cannot find evidence of a steam locomotive numbered 6739. With the NYC System, a lot of renumberings took place. Perhaps if someone has access to an American Locomotive construction list, that person can check out as built numbers.



Date: 04/17/19 11:37
Re: ID needed for 2-8-0 # 6739 at Hill
Author: KCRW287

From the 1943 Official Guide station name HILL; ARK Frisco, Brit Col BC Elec, Maryland Pennsy, New Mex ATSF, Tenn NC&StL, VA Clinchfield, I hope this might help, KCRW287



Date: 04/17/19 13:01
Re: ID Hill
Author: timz

I'm guessing that building isn't a station
(i.e. not a place where passenger trains stop).



Date: 04/17/19 13:22
Re: ID Hill
Author: PlyWoody

Alco 72692 built March 1945 as 2-10-0 became U. S. Army #6739.  This looks like maybe a decapod to but I can not explain where the US Army used those engines at that date. 

Alco earlier built 2-8-0 in 1907 #44089 for NYC (CCC&StL) in 1907 with Number 6739.  This is most likely the answer if it is a consolidation in the photo.  Looks NYC to me but I do not know NYC. .  



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 04/17/19 13:33 by PlyWoody.



Date: 04/17/19 13:40
Re: ID Hill
Author: CPR_4000

PlyWoody Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Alco earlier built 2-8-0 in 1907 #44089 for NYC
> (CCC&StL) in 1907 with Number 6739.  This is most
> likely the answer if it is a consolidation in the
> photo. 

Yes, it's a Consolidation. Your info could be correct. The Big Four went to Cincinnati, maybe made transfer runs to the L&N at DeCoursey? (That could be the Kentucky connection.)



Date: 04/17/19 13:40
Re: ID Hill
Author: Baxtersta

From the dress of the people in the photo and the appearance of the original photogrpahic print, I believe that the image is pre-1920. If that inspres anyone's thinking.  



Date: 04/17/19 15:59
Re: ID Hill
Author: Frisco1522

I'm going with the Big 4.  Definitely a NYC look.




Date: 04/17/19 16:32
Re: ID Hill
Author: nycman

Steam Locomotives of the New York Central Lines, Vol.2, pretty much confirms Plywoody's numbers.  6739 was built by Alco in 1907 for the CCC&StL, (Big Four).  It was a Class G-6c.  That book has a photo of 6719 which looks to be identical to that in the original poster pic, including the footboards.  Minor differences include non-spoked wheels on leading truck, snding pipes a little different.   As far as HILL goes, I have no clue.



Date: 04/17/19 17:34
Re: ID Hill
Author: ts1457

nycman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ...   As far as HILL goes, I have no clue.

Hill, Michigan near Jackson MI on MC: 

http://www.michiganrailroads.com/stations-locations/102-jackson-county-38/1050-hill-mi-jackson

The Big Four's Cincinnati Northern subsidiary terminated at Jackson, MI.



Date: 04/17/19 18:23
Re: ID Hill
Author: Baxtersta

Thanks to everyone for trying to identify this one.  Especially nycman and ts1397 who nailed the engine and location.  I will see that this info gets added to the photos for future refernce.  



Date: 04/17/19 18:24
Re: ID needed for 2-8-0 # 6739 at Hill
Author: vern

Not much left today, but Big Four had a yard called "Hill" at Beech Grove,IN.

Vernon Sargent
Greencastle, IN



Date: 04/17/19 18:39
Re: ID needed for 2-8-0 # 6739 at Hill
Author: ts1457

vern Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not much left today, but Big Four had a yard
> called "Hill" at Beech Grove,IN

Thanks, however Hill, IN on the Big Four is not listed as a station in the Jan. 1910 Guide or the June 1916 one.



Date: 04/17/19 22:29
Re: ID needed for 2-8-0 # 6739 at Hill
Author: NYC303

ts1457 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> vern Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Not much left today, but Big Four had a yard
> > called "Hill" at Beech Grove,IN
>
> Thanks, however Hill, IN on the Big Four is not
> listed as a station in the Jan. 1910 Guide or the
> June 1916 one.

Not in the Guide as a station, but there is a yard and yard office named Hill mentioned in Big 4/NYC employee timetables in the Indianapolis area.



Date: 04/18/19 02:42
Re: ID needed for 2-8-0 # 6739 at Hill
Author: CPR_4000

NYC303 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not in the Guide as a station, but there is a yard
> and yard office named Hill mentioned in Big 4/NYC
> employee timetables in the Indianapolis area.

The structure in the photo looks more like a yard office than a "station" with agent, etc. You might have nailed it. Is Indy flat like the area in the picture?



Date: 04/18/19 07:56
Re: ID needed for 2-8-0 # 6739 at Hill
Author: ts1457

NYC303 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Not in the Guide as a station, but there is a yard
> and yard office named Hill mentioned in Big 4/NYC
> employee timetables in the Indianapolis area.

What time period are the timetables from?

Two plausible explanations. Because of  the apparent size of the place, I am leaning toward Beech Grove, IN now, but I think more information is needed either way.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/18/19 09:27 by ts1457.



Date: 04/18/19 16:47
Re: ID needed for 2-8-0 # 6739 at Hill
Author: vern

Beech Grove is a suburb of Indianapolis. Yes, it's "flatlands".

Vernon Sargent
Greencastle, IN



[ Share Thread on Facebook ] [ Search ] [ Start a New Thread ] [ Back to Thread List ] [ <Newer ] [ Older> ] 
Page created in 0.0518 seconds