Home | Open Account | Help | 273 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Steam & Excursion > Thank you, Martin!Date: 10/25/24 14:57 Thank you, Martin! Author: wcamp1472 From 10/ 19/ 24, 04:33...
I've just received my copy of the Book! Thank you, Martin, for pursuading me to order the "Shay" book. Its the MOST complete book I've ever seen on one builder, and one type! Its immense in information.. Thanks, again W. Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 10/25/24 15:04 by wcamp1472. Date: 10/26/24 03:36 Re: Thank you, Martin! Author: LoggerHogger Gald you like it. We all worked hard to get it right. It must have worked as we are already in the 3rd printing of the book.
Martin ![]() Date: 10/26/24 08:15 Re: Thank you, Martin! Author: Hillcrest May I add that as a companion to the Shay book, if you have any interest in Mallet Compound (and simple) Articulated logging locomotives "Timber Titans'" is worth every penny.
Cheers, Dave Date: 10/26/24 10:19 Re: Thank you, Martin! Author: wcamp1472 Thanks for the recommendation, there were a lot of forests that
were on relatively flat territory--- where they didn't need slow, heavy haulers. So, I'll add it in my library... Always appreciate book reccomentations.. W. Date: 10/26/24 10:25 Re: Thank you, Martin! Author: steamfan759 Yes - The Shay book is great and I use it for reference all the time. I also agree that Timber Titans is another book that I use on a regular basis.
Ron Date: 10/26/24 11:28 Re: Thank you, Martin! Author: LoggerHogger Date: 10/26/24 12:12 Re: Thank you, Martin! Author: TheButcherofBena Nice picture books however both have factual errors.
Date: 10/26/24 12:21 Re: Thank you, Martin! Author: LoggerHogger We have never had anyone point out even one error in Timber Titans. Care to share with us what you are referring to in order to see if it is an error or not?
Martin Date: 10/26/24 20:36 Re: Thank you, Martin! Author: Jsporseen LoggerHogger Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > We have never had anyone point out even one error > in Timber Titans. Care to share with us what you > are referring to in order to see if it is an error > or not? > Martin To be honest, have read both books and I can't say that there are no errors in "The Shay", because of it's size. I have read "The Timber Titans" c-t-c a couple of times and found none. I'm a little like Martin as I would like to know if, in fact, there actually are any in either. The amount of research done for both books was/is absolutely incredible. JOHN Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 10/26/24 21:05 by Jsporseen. Date: 10/27/24 07:08 Re: Thank you, Martin! Author: wcamp1472 Even if there were an errant date, or a missing hyphen, how would that
affecr the overall quality of the 'work'? Could the critic have done a better job --- publishing their own work ? Makers of beautiful bed quilts, with intricate designs and beautiful patterns, always include a subtle, but intentional 'error' buried in the work, as an admission that only God, creates perfect works... Quilters not only pay attention to finely crafted patterns, but also to things like hand stitches of fine dimension spacing being uniformly 10 stitches per inch, or other, uniform all-over, stitch-count in handmade quilts. A quality, hand crafted quilt can take a couple of years to complete. There are quality preferences ( and increased value$) of hand-made quilts, over quilts assembled and stitched together on a sewing machine. The crafter's 'error' is cleverly concealed, and the ultimate owners will never be able to locate the 'error'... But, the quilter smiles with pride over her works, ..each with a tiny, intentional glitch... W. Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 10/27/24 16:10 by wcamp1472. Date: 10/27/24 10:54 Re: Thank you, Martin! Author: JDLX I know I've committed my share of errors in print, things happen.
I know there were discussions on some other forums about a few of the errors that crept into the Shay book when it was first published. I also remember discussions about those that did get identified and supported being corrected in subsequent printings, unfortunately I haven't yet seen myself any copies from the second or third printing to check on those myself. It seems somewhat rare that opportunities to correct errors are provided in a lot of these types of works, so White River and the authors (Henderson/Benson/Kadelak/Hauff) deserve a lot of credit for making that happen. As for the TImber Titans book, I had a message from Tom Moungovan this morning asking me to refer back to a couple previous posts specifically about the California Western #46: https://www.trainorders.com/discussion/read.php?10,5257886,5257886#msg-5257886 https://www.trainorders.com/discussion/read.php?10,5273255,5274511#msg-5274511 Jeff Moore Elko, NV Date: 10/27/24 13:09 Re: Thank you, Martin! Author: TheButcherofBena As a 3rd generation railroader with some experience, training and education, my ego precludes the need to debate, argue, or always be right about all things railroad. Just making an observation. Perhaps I might have said nice pictorials, I have both books and wasn't suggesting the books are bad or not worth owning. I've authored a published book, and appreciate the work that goes toward a professional effort. Not saying I'm an author, nor do I pretend to be a good author or critic. It's a hobby, just made an observation. My observation is based on individuals including a very credible and well published author, and individuals in the industry with first hand rail and operating experience during the era in which the fine machines portrayed in the books were in operation. Although I enjoyed and took pride in my rail career; I still enjoy learning about railroads past and present. I've yet to encounter any railroader, "foamer", author, or student who knows everything. I assume the authors put in alot of effort to produce quality results. Since there were several authors involved, I don't know who was responsible for the specific material in the books and certainly not pointing fingers at anyone. No disrespect intended; again, it's a hobby and I have no interest in debates or the all too prevalent pissing matches between egos that surface in rail forums. If the original poster would like specifics, I'll be happy to discuss privately. There's some knowledgeable posters on this forum that I deem credible and enjoy learning from the information they share. Doesn't mean I won't do fact checking from time to time. One final thought; as a railroader I learned it helps to have a thick skin.
Date: 10/27/24 13:56 Re: Thank you, Martin! Author: Spoony81 ^^^^ that’s a lot of words that lead nowhere
Posted from iPhone Date: 10/27/24 14:23 Re: Thank you, Martin! Author: HotWater Spoony81 Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > ^^^^ that’s a lot of words that lead nowhere Post of the day on this thread! Date: 10/28/24 05:01 Re: Thank you, Martin! Author: JOHNY5ALIVE HotWater Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Spoony81 Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > ^^^^ that’s a lot of words that lead nowhere > > Post of the day on this thread! I agree….. that is a bunch of word salad. Let me stir the pot then back track but not really with a long meandering post with saying nothing of any substance. Posted from iPhone Date: 10/29/24 09:31 Re: Thank you, Martin! Author: PHall And BS like this is why Martin stopped posting daily here on Train Orders.
Date: 10/29/24 09:50 Re: Thank you, Martin! Author: dan point out the errors so they can be corrected
Date: 10/30/24 20:48 Re: Thank you, Martin! Author: portlander Martin is no stranger to errors. They were a regular occurrence on his former daily historical posts.
Date: 10/30/24 23:39 Re: Thank you, Martin! Author: wcamp1472 What was your intended purpose for THAT comment?
W. Date: 10/31/24 05:16 Re: Thank you, Martin! Author: Spoony81 portlander Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Martin is no stranger to errors. They were a > regular occurrence on his former daily historical > posts. Don’t be that guy… |