Home Open Account Help 323 users online

Steam & Excursion > SP 4449, anybody know where this one is?


Date: 12/23/24 16:35
SP 4449, anybody know where this one is?
Author: ssloansjca

SP 4449 under signal bridge
On Saturday, April 25, 1981, SP GS4 4449 went from Portland, OR, to Klamath Falls, OR, as part of its journey to Railfair 1981, the Grand Opening of the California State Railroad Museum in Sacramento, CA. SP 9338, an SD45T-2, traveled with it from Oakridge to Klamath Falls. I lost my notes from that trip, so I don't know where this photo was taken. It's somewhere between Oakridge and Klamath Falls.

I hope you like this post:

Steve Sloan
San José, CA

--

My train Website: http://www.ssloan.net/trains/
My train feed on Mastodon: https://sfba.social/@steve_sloan
My Instagram train feed: https://www.instagram.com/ssloansjca/
My train photography page on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/stevesloantrains
My train photo blog: https://stevesloantrains.blogspot.com/


Please do not edit, crop, "correct" or "improve" my photos without asking me first.

Questions about my sources and the information presented here? Please check this out:

http://www.ssloan.net/trains/sources




Date: 12/23/24 17:10
Re: SP 4449, anybody know where this one is?
Author: refarkas

Well-crafted view!
Bob



Date: 12/23/24 17:11
Re: SP 4449, anybody know where this one is?
Author: HotWater

refarkas Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well-crafted view!
> Bob

Yes. But, where is it?



Date: 12/23/24 17:14
Re: SP 4449, anybody know where this one is?
Author: swaool

Looks like Chemult OR.

mike woodruff
north platte ne



Date: 12/23/24 20:51
Re: SP 4449, anybody know where this one is?
Author: JDLX

If it is Chemult it can only be at the end of the siding south of town. Was there a signal bridge there? Not one now.

Thanks for posting the photo!

Jeff Moore
Elko, NV

Posted from iPhone



Date: 12/23/24 21:06
Re: SP 4449, anybody know where this one is?
Author: TCnR

Agree W. Chemult. Signal bridge and a slight rise to one side of the track, maybe a curve and also road access. Compare with the photos of the signals in this webpage:

https://www.redoveryellow.com/signals/cs/_638-682.html

Amazing days, lots to see.



Date: 12/23/24 21:26
Re: SP 4449, anybody know where this one is?
Author: JDLX

Thanks, those photos confirm the one time existence of a signal bridge at the south end of the siding, I'm fully on board with Chemult.  

Jeff Moore
Elko, NV



Date: 12/24/24 09:22
Re: SP 4449, anybody know where this one is?
Author: wp1801

TCnR Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Agree W. Chemult. Signal bridge and a slight rise
> to one side of the track, maybe a curve and also
> road access. Compare with the photos of the                               A great series of engineer's views!
> signals in this webpage:
>
> https://www.redoveryellow.com/signals/cs/_638-682.
> html
>
> Amazing days, lots to see.



Date: 12/24/24 09:51
Re: SP 4449, anybody know where this one is?
Author: ssloansjca

Hey folks thanks so much for the comments. As Colin Smith said, "this is most definitely the Chemult, OR signal bridge, now known under UP as 'CP VP502 Chemult'."



Date: 12/27/24 13:50
Re: SP 4449, anybody know where this one is?
Author: ns1000

Nice pic!!



Date: 01/01/25 20:26
Re: SP 4449, anybody know where this one is?
Author: jbwest

Is this picture from April 1981 also from Chemult?  Clearly a different signal bridge, but other features seem similar to the first picture.  From the pix on the redoveryellow.com site, I would guess  right at CP VP493 Yamsay.

JBWX

 



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/01/25 20:36 by jbwest.




Date: 01/02/25 09:58
Re: SP 4449, anybody know where this one
Author: wcamp1472

Note the difference in the "draft intensity' of the two exhaust ( smoke) patterns;
comparing Photo 1 to Photo 2.

Photo 2 is with a virtually-closed throttle,  no draft at all from the cylinders.
Low draft always means low oxygen content, so even a little too much fuel 
and you've got too much freed-up carbon from the fire ---- but, adding more 
fuel simply makes for more unburnable, released carbon-chains.

What's needed is more OXYGEN, but there's no commensurate draft,
even with a wide-open 'blower-valve'.  The engineer, and the train + track grades
determine the draft rate into the firebox.  The fireman has little control over the 
available combustion-oxygen.

The  "blower valve"  is controlled in the cab by the fireman --- and is used when standing,
to keep flames and fumes out of the cab.  A full-open blower valve only approximates
about 3% to 5% of the draft from the pistons!

So, the effect you're seeing in both photos is a fireman, behind in 
his firing skills, so he's trying to play 'catch-up' --- by adding too much fuel
for the available oxygen...but, lack of air draft is working against him....
adding more fuel is making things worse-er, NOT better!


W.


( For you 'valve-gear fans': in photo 2, note that the Walschaert valve gear is set
  with the radius-rod set very near the center-pivot of the Walschaert ( curved)
  "reverse-link).

 



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/02/25 10:06 by wcamp1472.



[ Share Thread on Facebook ] [ Search ] [ Start a New Thread ] [ Back to Thread List ] [ <Newer ] [ Older> ] 
Page created in 0.0772 seconds