Home | Open Account | Help | 381 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Nostalgia & History > Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA'sDate: 02/21/19 11:27 Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA's Author: photobob Santa Fe PA's 67 & 58 lead a special train at Collier, California for the last Santa Fe passenger train hauled by PA's on March 3,1968.
Robert Morris Dunsmuir, CA Robert Morris Photography Date: 02/21/19 11:47 Re: Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA's Author: FiveChime Pacific Locomotive Association excursion Richmond to Stockton and return.
Regards, Jim Evans Date: 02/21/19 13:44 Re: Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA's Author: refarkas An "A+" image to honor an American beauty.
Bob Date: 02/21/19 17:40 Re: Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA's Author: M-420 It really doesn't get better than that...
I think I read somewhere that one of the two failed on this trip and the other unit pulled the rest of the trip solo... B Date: 02/21/19 17:51 Re: Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA's Author: E25 A nice "PA angle." Thanks!
Greg Stadter Phoenix, AZ Date: 02/21/19 18:22 Re: Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA's Author: tomstp I will never forget the sound of those things idling. It sound like pistons were swapping holes.
Date: 02/21/19 19:18 Re: Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA's Author: dan The b units on rg, sp, and SF disappeared first from what you guys say.
Date: 02/21/19 19:47 Re: Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA's Author: sgriggs Great photo. Love the warbonnet PA's.
Scott Griggs Louisville, KY Date: 02/21/19 23:48 Re: Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA's Author: hawkinsun Beautiful. I can't imagine anyone not liking a Santa Fe PA. Too bad the pair didn't go straight to a good museum at the end of the day. Sad to see what happened to almost all the rest of them. I saw bunches of both Santa Fe and GM&O PAs traded in to EMD at LaGrange sometime in the 60s. I'd guess those were all scrapped.
Craig Hanson Vay, Idaho Date: 02/22/19 05:40 Re: Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA's Author: WrongWayMurphy Love those heads poking out of every orifice in the cars behind the PA’s
Date: 02/22/19 06:40 Re: Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA's Author: jtbrandt tomstp Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > I will never forget the sound of those things > idling. It sound like pistons were swapping > holes. I'm not really sure what that sounds like, but would like to. Date: 02/22/19 07:21 Re: Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA's Author: jdw3460 When the Santa Fe introduced the Texas Chief in 1948 I was an 11-year-old kid. But I recognized the beauty of the brand new PA's on that train as being somethintg special. They were pristine..........no ladders for the windshield washers, only a pair of single "blat" horns (one pointed in each direction), no access holes on the nose, and no radio antenna. Originally, I think they used an A-B pair but the train grew to around 15 cars fairly soon and an A-B-A set was used after that, until the F-7's came along and replaced them. Many years later........about 1962.......they were still running on the San Francisco Chief over Tehachapi. And the mail train, Nos. 7-8, used them in sets of 4 for years. The beauty, the sound, and the smoke of the Alco PA's really made a mark on locomotive history.
Date: 02/22/19 09:15 Re: Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA's Author: SN711 Beautiful shot, as usual, from a very familiar place.
Thanks Gary Posted from iPhone Date: 02/22/19 10:48 Re: Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA's Author: davew833 EMD's policy for scrapping trade-in locomotives was pretty strict. There weren't any PAs that escaped. GE, on the other hand, allowed D&H to buy back an ex-NH PA that was stripped for parts in order to keep their other four operating.
Date: 02/22/19 11:01 Re: Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA's Author: Roadjob Best paint scheme ever put on a PA. Beautiful shot showing both power and grace.
Bill Rettberg Bel Air, MD Date: 02/22/19 11:29 Re: Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA's Author: hawkinsun Didn't the Santa Fe also have some DL109s in this paint scheme ? Just out of curiosity, how different were the PAs from the DL series locomotives. I'm sure the PAs would win the vote for looks, compared to a DL, but were the guts under the body shell the same, or similar ? I know the Milwaukee Road, in an effort to make their DL110s conform to their EMD style locomotives, chopped the noses off their "Old Maud", and put an F or E unit nose on one, or both of them. They lived on, but OH MY, what a wasted effort.
Craig Hanson Vay, Idaho Date: 02/22/19 14:27 Re: Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA's Author: RRBMail Roadjob Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Best paint scheme ever put on a PA. Beautiful shot > showing both power and grace. Best paint scheme on anything, even a bread box! Date: 02/22/19 15:22 Re: Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA's Author: bmarti7 RRBaron Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Roadjob Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Best paint scheme ever put on a PA. Beautiful > shot > > showing both power and grace. > > Best paint scheme on anything, even a bread box! Amen! and thanks Bob for posting. BB Date: 02/22/19 19:35 Re: Last Santa Fe passenger run with PA's Author: M-420 hawkinsun Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Didn't the Santa Fe also have some DL109s in this > paint scheme ? Just out of curiosity, how > different were the PAs from the DL series > locomotives. I'm sure the PAs would win the vote > for looks, compared to a DL, but were the guts > under the body shell the same, or similar ? I > know the Milwaukee Road, in an effort to make > their DL110s conform to their EMD style > locomotives, chopped the noses off their "Old > Maud", and put an F or E unit nose on one, or both > of them. They lived on, but OH MY, what a > wasted effort. > > Craig Hanson > Vay, Idaho Craig The PA had a single 16-244 prime mover vs two 8-539's in the DL-109. There are plenty of other differences, but the basic answer is that the two model were not similar internally (or externally) at all. |