Home | Open Account | Help | 387 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Nostalgia & History > ATSF Q Train ?Date: 11/21/19 15:20 ATSF Q Train ? Author: WichitaJct 7400 and an SD45 on the point of an EB (NB geographically) at North Wichita (KS.) June 1988. Could this have been one of those short lived Q trains?
Date: 11/21/19 18:00 Re: ATSF Q Train ? Author: dan fits the bill
Date: 11/22/19 07:50 Re: ATSF Q Train ? Author: ntharalson Short lived???? Seems to me the Q-NYLA made it to the BNSF merger and survives today as the Q-NYCLAC. Just saying.
Nick Tharalson, Marion, IA Date: 11/22/19 10:11 Re: ATSF Q Train ? Author: WichitaJct The Q trains in question were, I believe, an "experiment ATSF did in the late 80s to capture short haul intermodal traffic. One of the changes was a concession from the operating unions for longer crew runs. As I recall the trainmen's union agreed but the engineers did not.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/22/19 10:11 by WichitaJct. Date: 11/22/19 10:28 Re: ATSF Q Train ? Author: wag216 I do not think that is a "Q" train. Of course, I did not see every ''Q"' train at here in Wichita. My shots show a single 4 motor unit and 4 - 10 cars. wag216
Date: 11/22/19 15:59 Re: ATSF Q Train ? Author: KskidinTx That empty flat car would restrict the train to a maximum of 55 mph so I also doubt that is a "Q" train.
Mark Date: 11/22/19 20:10 Re: ATSF Q Train ? Author: bnsfsd70 Neat! Love that B39-8!
- Jeff Carlson Date: 11/22/19 22:34 Re: ATSF Q Train ? Author: willieb007 Technically speaking, the Q-NYLA became the Z-NYCLAC9 and still runs. It formerly received Conrail UPS trailers from New Jersey via TV-9 if I remember correctly. There is a Q-NYCLAC, but it basically handles the domestic coast to coast stacks. The Z9 handles Hot UPS, LTL TOFC/COFC forwarded from NS, originating in Rutherford and Croxton, New Jersey. In return the Q-LANY, became the Z-LACNYC9 and handles Los Angeles to New Jersey (New York) traffic via NS symbol 20W.
Date: 11/23/19 02:10 Re: ATSF Q Train ? Author: RHicks KskidinTx Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > That empty flat car would restrict the train to a > maximum of 55 mph so I also doubt that is a "Q" > train. > Mark It could be a Q theres a contanier on that flat car Date: 11/23/19 06:15 Re: ATSF Q Train ? Author: KskidinTx Yes, I stand corrected. I should have looked closer before responding.
Date: 11/23/19 06:27 Re: ATSF Q Train ? Author: texchief1 I thought the Q experiment was all trailers and containers. Didn't know it had vehicle traffic. Could be wrong, which wouldn't surprise me.
Randy Lundgren Elgin, TX Date: 11/23/19 17:33 Re: ATSF Q Train ? Author: skinem Of course anything's possible, but never saw them with anything but four-axle power. We would have a P/U for the WB's on a regular basis, but can't remember so much for the EB's. The combined seniority of those reduced crews probably exceeded most of the combined seniority of full crews that were out there.
|