Home | Open Account | Help | 272 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Nostalgia & History > RVM-133: Southwestern trio ... @ Hurley NMDate: 03/19/25 07:27 RVM-133: Southwestern trio ... @ Hurley NM Author: valmont Worth my visits ... first 2 on 4/5/91, 3rd on 4/14/91 ... Hurley NM was the subject of a 'mini-revolt' at the annual WGRF get together when 'masterphots' and I tried to get the votes to pick Hurley for the site of the following years WGRF. Not exactly the kind of location that WGRF would select ...
We did get some votes but not nearly enough to win ; ^ ) I have posted this several times in the past ... a very attractive mini-roster ... ![]() ![]() ![]() Date: 03/19/25 09:37 Re: RVM-133: Southwestern trio ... @ Hurley NM Author: bobdavis That paint scheme sure is different. I like it!
Bob Date: 03/19/25 09:47 Re: RVM-133: Southwestern trio ... @ Hurley NM Author: texchief1 Nice images! What is the WGRF?
texchief1 Date: 03/19/25 15:07 Re: RVM-133: Southwestern trio ... @ Hurley NM Author: CDTX Does anyone have information as to how the Southwestern was sold this SD45?
Thanks! Jeff Date: 03/19/25 18:18 Re: RVM-133: Southwestern trio ... @ Hurley NM Author: up833 Worlds Greatest Raulfans
RB Date: 03/19/25 22:05 Re: RVM-133: Southwestern trio ... @ Hurley NM Author: Evan_Werkema CDTX Wrote:
> Does anyone have information as to how the Southwestern was sold this SD45? Santa Fe 1992 Annual shows ATSF 5316 retired March 1990 and sold to Southwestern in August 1990. Extra 2200 South issue 91 shows Santa Fe selling GP7's 2182, 2211, and SD45 5316 to the new shortline that month. Date: 03/20/25 06:40 Re: RVM-133: Southwestern trio ... @ Hurley NM Author: masterphots valmont Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Worth my visits ... first 2 on 4/5/91, 3rd on > 4/14/91 ... Hurley NM was the subject of a > 'mini-revolt' at the annual WGRF get together when > 'masterphots' and I tried to get the votes to pick > Hurley for the site of the following years WGRF. > Not exactly the kind of location that WGRF would > select ... > > We did get some votes but not nearly enough to win > ; ^ ) I have posted this several times in the past > ... a very attractive mini-roster ... I still think it was a great idea. So take that Jimmy H! |