Home | Open Account | Help | 340 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Canadian Railroads > a few of "on this day" ten years agoDate: 11/20/16 16:05 a few of "on this day" ten years ago Author: hoggerdoug few images taken at Williams Lake BC, we would eventually use these units with 4612 leading north to Quesnel BC.
first images of the 4612 on the north leg of the wye. Date: 11/20/16 16:08 Re: a few of "on this day" ten years ago Author: hoggerdoug three views of the 4611, looks okay but I, C something missing. Looks like a bad pot of coffee out the window on the Conductors side.
Date: 11/20/16 16:11 Re: a few of "on this day" ten years ago Author: hoggerdoug Date: 11/20/16 17:47 Re: a few of "on this day" ten years ago Author: PHall Were the BC Rail and CN yard slugs "interchangable"? i.e. same connections.
Date: 11/20/16 18:10 Re: a few of "on this day" ten years ago Author: sarailfan The door on 747 seems to be a case of "parts is parts" Can't tell what railroad's unit it was off of though, possibly something out of the back forty at Larry's Truck!
Darren Boes Lethbridge, AB Southern Alberta Railfan Date: 11/20/16 18:23 Re: a few of "on this day" ten years ago Author: hoggerdoug PHall Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Were the BC Rail and CN yard slugs > "interchangable"? i.e. same connections. To be quite honest, I'm not sure. The BCR slugs were "home built" and may not have been compatible with other equipment. Although the MU electrical and air were compatible with any locomotive. The internal controls may not have been compatiable operation wise. Doug Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/20/16 18:32 by hoggerdoug. Date: 11/20/16 18:42 Re: a few of "on this day" ten years ago Author: cn6218 PHall Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Were the BC Rail and CN yard slugs > "interchangable"? i.e. same connections. I don't know the answer, but it appears that there is a CN GP9 on the other end of that slug, so it may very well be the "mother" that is supplying power to it. GTD Date: 11/21/16 03:57 Re: a few of "on this day" ten years ago Author: hoggerdoug cn6218 Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > PHall Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Were the BC Rail and CN yard slugs > > "interchangable"? i.e. same connections. > > I don't know the answer, but it appears that > there is a CN GP9 on the other end of that slug, > so it may very well be the "mother" that is > supplying power to it. > > GTD Yes, most likely the CN geep is supplying power to the slug, and the 617 is operating via the MU cable as trailing unit. Memory serves me that quite often in Williams Lake yard crew operated beltpack, the yard power was setup this way, unit / slug / unit or just 2 units back to back. Belt pack (RCO) crews were not allowed to "change ends" on the yard power. In the good old days with real yard crew & engineer, we worked with one unit and a slug, sometimes two units, and could out perform any belt pack crew. Doug |