Home | Open Account | Help | 383 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
European Railroad Discussion > Amersfoort, NLDate: 09/19/17 06:34 Amersfoort, NL Author: ocswitcher Date: 09/19/17 09:36 Re: Amersfort, NL Author: andersonb109 New candidate for ugliest train. Looks a bit like the front of the UA Turbos.
Date: 09/19/17 09:42 Re: Amersfort, NL Author: JimBaker Does the plain front open to provide a safe passageway for access for passengers?
James R.(Jim) Baker Whittier, CA Date: 09/19/17 09:54 Re: Amersfort, NL Author: DavidP JimBaker Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > Does the plain front open to provide a safe > passageway for access for passengers? Yes. Three or four unit sets typically operate in multiple. Dave Date: 09/19/17 11:02 Re: Amersfort, NL Author: JimBaker Thanks, That's why they look that way!
James R.(Jim) Baker Whittier, CA Date: 09/19/17 12:13 Re: Amersfort, NL Author: 86235 DavidP Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > JimBaker Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Does the plain front open to provide a safe > > passageway for access for passengers? > > > Yes. Three or four unit sets typically operate in > multiple. > > Dave Yes they work in multiple but there is no passage between units anymore. The gangways gave all sorts of problems so on refurbishment they were sealed. Date: 09/19/17 15:28 Re: Amersfoort, NL Author: gaspeamtrak Nice pictures! They look pretty neat, would love to see the inside of the front area? Thank you for sharing... Beauty is in the eye of the beholder :):):)
Date: 09/19/17 18:35 Re: Amersfoort, NL Author: ocswitcher Date: 09/20/17 03:47 Re: Amersfoort, NL Author: march_hare The visibility from the cab must be horrible. I wonder how they couple them together without being able to see down. Maybe you don't need that visibility with buffer couplers?
Date: 09/20/17 04:34 Re: Amersfoort, NL Author: 86235 march_hare Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > The visibility from the cab must be horrible. I > wonder how they couple them together without being > able to see down. Maybe you don't need that > visibility with buffer couplers? I agree, coupling units must be a challenge but they don't have any buffers, looks like a Tightlock or Dellner auto couplers. Date: 09/20/17 19:21 Re: Amersfoort, NL Author: ocswitcher Date: 09/24/17 04:01 Re: Amersfoort, NL Author: Ray_Murphy Class ICM: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NS_Intercity_Materieel
The style is called Koploper (head walker) in Dutch. It's been around for decades. Ray Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/24/17 04:58 by Ray_Murphy. Date: 09/24/17 17:33 Re: Amersfoort, NL Author: Darryl I lived there for a year and really liked the Koplopers- something different with their distinctive jumbo-jet driver's perch.
The VIRM units are the best looking in my opinion and they all stand out nicely in the yellow and blue. Posted from iPhone Date: 09/26/17 01:48 Re: Amersfort, NL Author: Hiroshi Date: 09/26/17 12:03 Re: Amersfort, NL Author: SOO6617 The Red unit in pictures #1 and #2 is a "Hondekop" "Dog's Head" unit. Built in the mid to late 50's.
Date: 10/02/17 14:26 Re: Amersfort, NL Author: grether SOO6617 Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > The Red unit in pictures #1 and #2 is a "Hondekop" > "Dog's Head" unit. Built in the mid to late 50's. Actually it is a "Plan U" diesel - https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_U |