Home Open Account Help 205 users online

Model Railroading > Vote for Atlas' "Spirt of USA" caboose


Date: 03/08/02 13:02
Vote for Atlas' "Spirt of USA" caboose
Author: ahockley




Date: 03/08/02 13:18
RE: Vote for Atlas' "Spirit of USA" cabo
Author: WrongWayMurphy

I kinda liked A the best.



Date: 03/08/02 13:33
RE: Vote for Atlas' "Spirt of USA" caboo
Author: railroad

Isn't it just something how easily Atlas can produce such a car when events like those of 9-11-01 take place, yet whenever we collectors ask them to manufacture something for us, it's a whole different story?! I believe that a model railroading layout should be non-denominational and non-political, after all, model railroading is for our personal enjoyment!

(Just Venting...) JOHN



Date: 03/08/02 13:34
My Vote
Author: burlingtonjohn

I voted "D" for two reasons:

- I have actually purchased one of the HO 'Spirit' engines, so it matches the scheme.

- I am in the Navy and have many friends who are serving on the front lines as I type this. Since "D" has the logos of the various branches of the armed forces on it, it was an easy choice for me.

Regards,
Burlington John



Date: 03/08/02 15:13
RE: My Vote
Author: Amtrak-30

I vote A

Nice looking cabooses!!

Amtrak 30



Date: 03/08/02 15:47
RE: Vote for Atlas' "Spirt of USA" caboo
Author: Cascade

I voted for B

C is just the BC Rail paint scheme with a small touch up, and it should be something unique.



Date: 03/08/02 16:26
RE: Wish it looked like this...
Author: gubbins

'cause it'd fit on my layout better, but A or B are cool.

(Picture from Mr. Percy's most excellent Espee site)




Date: 03/09/02 04:20
Liked A but voted D
Author: railtrekker

To honor our military who's away from home allowing us OUR freedom. We continue to pray for our military and President.



Date: 03/09/02 04:27
RE: Liked A but voted D
Author: NORAC

I voted for A.....but I think the number 911 is not appropriate.



[ Share Thread on Facebook ] [ Search ] [ Start a New Thread ] [ Back to Thread List ] [ <Newer ] [ Older> ] 
Page created in 0.0303 seconds