Home | Open Account | Help | 303 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Model Railroading > The BridgeDate: 09/18/23 20:27 The Bridge Author: wabash2800 It's a thru truss, but look at the portal ends at the tops that are open. Its marketed by a European model railroad company. I've seen it on a number of layouts including a couple of million dollar plus layouts that are supposed to represent U.S. railroads to the public.
Is there anything like this used by North American railroads? Victor Baird Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/18/23 20:41 by wabash2800. ![]() Date: 09/19/23 04:56 Re: The Bridge Author: sfn2633 Victor,
I practiced as a Structural Engineer and an open portal end is not correct. Stability is required for lateral forces and therefore some type of sway bent is required at major panel points. I would call this a modeling simplification! Jeff N Olathe, KS Date: 09/19/23 06:49 Re: The Bridge Author: boejoe I assembled an HO kit like this 60 years ago in Germany. Believe it was made by Kibri.
jb Date: 09/19/23 10:07 Re: The Bridge Author: Trainmaniac07 This is just on the East side of Platsmouth NE.
[url=http://https://www.google.com/maps/@41.0014803,-95.8657401,3a,75y,255.76h,88.9t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sxarfDYVMvlYigZ6hgKZ5ig!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?entry=ttu]Google Maps link[/url] -Zach Date: 09/19/23 10:32 Re: The Bridge Author: ATSFSuperCap Walthers and Central Valley Model Works each have a nice selection of bridge kits that are North American style and correct per prototype.
Date: 09/19/23 11:24 Re: The Bridge Author: Lighter Never say never with European bridges - but, this combination of a pony truss at the ends and a (warren?) truss in the middle is not likely in North
American bridge engineering. As other folks have mentioned there are lots of reasonably accurate bridges available in HO scale. Just a guess - the model might be that way because European catenary would foul a portal at the ends of the truss. Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 09/21/23 10:52 by Lighter. Date: 09/19/23 15:38 Re: The Bridge Author: wabash2800 Folks, I knew that, but if I would have said it's wrong, I would have got a lot of "it's my railroad!" replies.
Victor Baird Posted from Android Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 09/20/23 11:46 by wabash2800. Date: 09/20/23 15:01 Re: The Bridge Author: NSDTK So if per you this style bridge cant exist. Why does it exist in the real world and support trains.
https://www.dreamstime.com/steel-arch-truss-railroad-bridge-across-river-span-riveted-over-fragment-darnytskyi-dnieper-kyiv-ukraine-image187848852 sfn2633 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Victor, > > I practiced as a Structural Engineer and an open > portal end is not correct. Stability is required > for lateral forces and therefore some type of sway > bent is required at major panel points. I would > call this a modeling simplification! > > Jeff N > Olathe, KS Date: 09/20/23 16:26 Re: The Bridge Author: wabash2800 You may be asking Jeff, But I would say that is a heavier bridge which also includes more support underneath. I still doubt that you would see anything like this here in North America, as our trains are much heavier than Europeon trains.
Victor Baird Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/23/23 10:16 by wabash2800. Date: 09/21/23 04:34 Re: The Bridge Author: sfn2633 If you look carefully at the photo you will see an end portal is actually in place. It is in the form of a K-brace system.
Whether the bridge has a sloped or horizontal chord, or an arched top chord, is not a factor in the need to provide sway stability to the structure. Jeff N |