Home | Open Account | Help | 344 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Passenger Trains > NARP news release on StarlightDate: 02/13/08 08:16 NARP news release on Starlight Author: mundo Start of a new round of protests.
If you as a reader have not yet sent Amtrak your remarks on the Starlight do it now. Ed National Association of Railroad Passengers www.narprail.org 900 Second St., N.E., Suite 308 Washington, DC 20002-3557 Telephone 202-408-8362 For Immediate Release (#08-03) February 13, 2008 NARP Praises Partial Restoration of Amtrak's Coast Starlight - Presses full restoration in March -- Washington, D.C., February 13, 2008 -- In an open letter to Amtrak released today, the National Association of Railroad Passengers (NARP) praised Amtrak's decision to reinstate its "Coast Starlight" train between Los Angeles and Sacramento. The Association also urged the railroad to restore the entire run to Seattle by March 4, using buses for the Klamath Falls-Eugene segment if tracks closed by a January mud slide remain impassable. NARP's letter expressed concern "about the impact of no service for an indefinite period north of Sacramento. A prolonged Starlight service outage * inconveniences passengers--likely working a severe hardship on many; * means continued loss of nearly 90% of the Starlight's normal revenues; * depresses revenues on the rest of the system, since so many Starlight passengers connect with other Amtrak trains; and * harms the Thruway business partners that let the Starlight serve Vancouver, British Columbia, via bus to and from Seattle, and a number of Oregon communities via connections at Klamath Falls, Chemult and Eugene." For a few days after the mud slide closed Union Pacific's main line near Frazier, Oregon, Amtrak maintained service by running Los Angeles-Klamath Falls and Portland-Seattle trains and Klamath Falls-Portland buses. After that, Amtrak suspended the entire "Coast Starlight" service. In its letter, NARP urged Amtrak to immediately resume selling Starlight travel for March 4 and later dates. The letter said, "With the limited service that Amtrak is currently providing, the only route between the Pacific Northwest and California is via Chicago, which is unacceptable. Amtrak, as the nation's only interstate passenger rail operator, has a responsibility to serve as much of this important rail route as possible." NARP's letter further noted that the "Starlight" serves a large number of universities and colleges, and spring break is fast approaching. An announcement about restored service and resumed ticket sales will be important to those looking to make travel plans soon. On its fortieth anniversary last year, NARP proposed a grid-and-gateway networked train system that would connect cities and communities across America and would provide for alternative service when emergencies such as this arise. That vision for America, and a map illustrating possible routes, are at www.narprail.org/vision. NARP's proposal influenced the recommendations of a blue-ribbon federal commission in January, which fleshed out this vision with financing and legislative proposals, and called for more comprehensive and rational transportation investment decisions. "The Coast Starlight situation reiterates the importance of a comprehensive national train network," said Capon. "Amtrak needs to recognize the huge damage of lost revenues, plan carefully, resume serving customers and earning that revenue, and stop being paralyzed by the fear that something might go wrong." The Coast Starlight is widely acknowledged as one of Amtrak's most important overnight routes. It is the only north-south route west of the Mississippi River and it is used by passengers connecting with other Amtrak routes. The routes which directly connect with the Starlight are the Empire Builder, California Zephyr, Southwest Chief, Sunset Limited, and California's San Joaquins and Pacific Surfliners. Date: 02/13/08 08:55 Re: NARP news release on Starlight Author: sfericsf mundo Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > On its fortieth anniversary last year, NARP > proposed a grid-and-gateway > networked train system that would connect cities > and communities across > America and would provide for alternative service > when emergencies such > as this arise. That vision for America, and a map > illustrating possible > routes, are at www.narprail.org/vision. Excellent map. This passenger train service *should* exist today! Date: 02/13/08 10:05 Re: NARP news release on Starlight Author: smitty195 Definitely keep those emails and letters going to DC (reps and Amtrak both). They need to hear from more people. It's been my opinion from the get-go that this whole suspension thing of 11/14 is ridiculous. The stub train is a step in the right direction, but it's a half-as*ed attempt at it. LAX to SAC with no meal options except a hot dog (more or less)? No day rooms available in a single sleeper? Hold the people responsible for this decision accountable!!
And just a random thought, but how will all of this effect the highly trumpeted re-launch of this train in May? Granted, having the equipment sitting around in the yard should SPEED UP the re-launch and give them time to make the necessary changes and spiff the cars up. But this is Amtrak, and reason and common sense usually don't prevail. Date: 02/13/08 11:51 Re: NARP news release on Starlight Author: ProAmtrak All I can say is they get the bus bridge back, that'll be a big plus too! I for one am still wondring if 25 and 26 get ressurrected that's one step in NARP's Direction on a growing antional system besides corridor proposals!
Date: 02/13/08 12:04 Re: NARP news release on Starlight Author: ssafy The real reason is the Pacific Northwest has no political clout like California or the Ne Corridor
Same problem in Canada. Your local reps couldn't care less. Date: 02/13/08 13:05 Re: NARP news release on Starlight Author: sfericsf ssafy Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > The real reason is the Pacific Northwest has no > political clout like California or the Ne > Corridor > Same problem in Canada. Your local reps couldn't > care less. Why does train service have to be political? It is my honest opinion that if these trains were in operation today, and the on board service was not bad Amtrak service, but a higher standard and level of service (perhaps privatized?), these trains would be well utilized. (And I'm talking service from all aspects, from the stations being clean and well kept to the ticket agents friendly and courteous - actually grateful for your business, to the on board personel, etc. I'm not sayin' all service on Amtrak is bad, but I've encountered enough "bad apples" and I have witnessed enough passengers being mis-treated and it's a real shame.) Date: 02/13/08 20:41 Re: NARP news release on Starlight Author: PasadenaSub I'd think the e-mails and letters should go to the officials in the State of Jefferson, since this embargo effects much of their area. Unfortunately, I can't locate the exact state capitol for Jefferson <G>.
Date: 02/13/08 20:43 Re: NARP news release on Starlight Author: mundo And may we ask, when did the State of Jefferson join the Union?
Might you mean the State Missouri, with Jefferson City the state Capitol on the Amtrak/UP mule route and travels as slow as a mule. Date: 02/13/08 20:53 Re: NARP news release on Starlight Author: PasadenaSub State of Jefferson background:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_of_Jefferson mundo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > And may we ask, when did the State of Jefferson > join the Union? > > Might you mean the State Missouri, with Jefferson > City the state Capitol on the Amtrak/UP mule route > and travels as slow as a mule. Date: 02/14/08 10:01 Re: NARP news release on Starlight Author: BrianJennison I think the capital of Jefferson is Yreka, CA, although I myself prefer Weed... :-)
|