Passenger Trains > LD train arrivals at Chicago today

Long Distance trains arrived at Chicago Union Station today, November 20, 2014 as follows :

#4 - 29 mins late.
#6 - 3 hrs, 10 mins late.
#8 - 53 mins late.
#22 - 2 mins late.
#29 - 16 mins late.
#49 - Annulled. Service Disruption.
#51 - 24 mins early.
#58 - 2 hrs, 14 mins late.

All trains departed their originating stations within 5 mins of "On Time" (or were reported On Time at some point in their route) except #49 which did not operate.

John Webb
Trinidad, CA

Winnemucca Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Long Distance trains arrived at Chicago Union
> Station today, November 20, 2014 as follows :
>
> #4 - 29 mins late.
> #6 - 3 hrs, 10 mins late.
> #8 - 53 mins late.
> #22 - 2 mins late.
> #29 - 16 mins late.
> #49 - Annulled. Service Disruption.
> #51 - 24 mins early.
> #58 - 2 hrs, 14 mins late.
>
> All trains departed their originating stations
> within 5 mins of "On Time" (or were reported On
> Time at some point in their route) except #49
> which did not operate.
Wow, the "Capitol Limited" #29 made it almost on time today, a miracle for sure.

why do you have the same times listed twice ??

ClubCar Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Winnemucca Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Long Distance trains arrived at Chicago Union
> > Station today, November 20, 2014 as follows :
> >
> > #4 - 29 mins late.
> > #6 - 3 hrs, 10 mins late.
> > #8 - 53 mins late.
> > #22 - 2 mins late.
> > #29 - 16 mins late.
> > #49 - Annulled. Service Disruption.
> > #51 - 24 mins early.
> > #58 - 2 hrs, 14 mins late.
> >
> > All trains departed their originating stations
> > within 5 mins of "On Time" (or were reported On
> > Time at some point in their route) except #49
> > which did not operate.
> Wow, the "Capitol Limited" #29 made it almost on
> time today, a miracle for sure.

I assume, railrunner, that you are referring to #49. On a previous occasion I was taken to task by another TO poster for not mentioning this in the final line, thus implying, according to the poster, that some one might think #49 left on time, which it did not because it did not operate. Therefor in the interest of clarity and, at the risk of redundancy, I inserted the mention.

John Webb
Trinidad, CA



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/21/14 16:36 by Winnemucca.