Home | Open Account | Help | 386 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Passenger Trains > Is AT considered a LD train?Date: 04/23/18 16:45 Is AT considered a LD train? Author: SANSR If so, anyone want to speculate on the potential future of this unique Amtrak option?
Thanks in advance. Date: 04/23/18 17:03 Re: Is AT considered a LD train? Author: johnpage It is, by Amtrak's definition, a long distance train. It takes in about $73 million a year in revenue and hauls 238,400 passengers a year, plus their vehicles. It's load factor is 59%, which is a little on the low side considering it operates only terminal to terminal. At any given time, there are 331 passengers onboard.
Auto Train creates 14% of the gross revenue of the long distance system. Since just about everything about the Auto Train is self-contained, the answer to your question may be one of two things: Leave it alone and let it continue as is, or, privatize it. Date: 04/24/18 13:15 Re: Is AT considered a LD train? Author: hazegray johnpage Wrote:
------------------------------------------------------- > > Since just about everything about the Auto Train is self-contained, the answer to your question may > be one of two things: Leave it alone and let it continue as is, or, privatize it. Auto-Train initially started as a private(ized) operation, and went bankrupt! Date: 04/24/18 14:09 Re: Is AT considered a LD train? Author: Lackawanna484 I've often thought AutoTrain should be a candidate for dynamic pricing. Offer lower priced buckets in off peak directions, for example.
I've been on a northbound, full length train in November with just one diner seating. And two coaches closed off. Why not offer a econo price to draw some traffic off I-95? You know one night at a. Hampton Inn plus 800 miles of gas will be $350, price the car plus sleeper ride at $300, all in. Buy a billboard to trumpet the deal. Posted from Android |