Home | Open Account | Help | 248 users online |
Member Login
Discussion
Media SharingHostingLibrarySite Info |
Railfan Technology > Motorola GM 300 vs Kenwood TK-7180 vs Realistic 400 CH Pro-2006Date: 09/06/21 15:17 Motorola GM 300 vs Kenwood TK-7180 vs Realistic 400 CH Pro-2006 Author: twropr Each of these radios has great reception on the radio streams that I listen to. Would either have better reception in my automobile than a 20-yr old Uniden
BC-142XL? Do they operate from battery power and accept PL-259 or Motorola plugs? Are these all scanners? Thanks Andy Date: 09/07/21 18:30 Re: Motorola GM 300 vs Kenwood TK-7180 vs Realistic 400 CH Pro-20 Author: WW I don't know where to start on this. Only the Pro-2006 is a scanner--it is a mobile scanner, likely with a PL-259 antenna connector. It's been out of production for quite awhile. The TK-2180 is a portable commercial radio that requires computer programming--it is not field programmable. The GM-300 is a commercial mobile radio. Again, not field programmable from the keypad. I'm guessing that you are looking at these on the used market. I would suggest that you do more research on this forum before you jump in a buy something that you likely can't use or won't meet your needs. There are pages and pages of posts on this forum about what works best, etc.
Date: 09/11/21 19:37 Re: Motorola GM 300 vs Kenwood TK-7180 vs Realistic 400 CH Pro-20 Author: DirtyShirt About five years ago I bought a used Kenwood TK-7180, the software to program it and the programming cable for a total of about $250-$300 on Ebay. It took me about 60 minutes to figure out how to use the programming software and get it programmed. I use it in my car powered by the "cigarette lighter" style power port. It has a PL-259 type antenna connection. It works great. I'll never go back to using scanners.
|