Home Open Account Help 321 users online

Passenger Trains > #8/27 with 130 leading doing a small wreck detour


Date: 05/29/19 06:08
#8/27 with 130 leading doing a small wreck detour
Author: inCHI

I'm on board. Yesterday across Montana we gradually lost time due to slow orders (guessing) and heavy freight traffic. We finally made that up with the padding in St. Paul. Now, right at departure time, they announced that there is a freight derailment ahead. It seems to not be too bad, we are backing out of the station to get on a different main track to get around it. I'll try to get pictures of it.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 05/29/19 06:09 by inCHI.



Date: 05/29/19 06:53
Re: #8/27 with 130 leading doing a small wreck detour
Author: AltiplanoRailtours1

The UP derailed a sand car right at the east approach to SPUD yesterday, I am guessing your detour was related to that.

Adam



Date: 05/29/19 07:35
Re: #8/27 with 130 leading doing a small wreck detour
Author: Cumbresfan

I'm on #7 - Just left Minot. We have at least six slow orders ahead of us. The derailment at the entrance to SPUD caused us to back in. Not too much of a delay.



Date: 05/29/19 07:38
Re: #8/27 with 130 leading doing a small wreck detour
Author: cajon

#7 also did a back up move into the station last night do to the derailment.
Dennis

Posted from iPhone



Date: 05/29/19 07:58
Re: #8/27 with 130 leading doing a small wreck detour
Author: joemvcnj

Is SPUD set up something like Toledo, normally go in on one end and out the other ?
Why is it impossible to set out and pick up PV's or a Chicago cut coach there ?



Date: 05/29/19 09:53
Re: #8/27 with 130 leading doing a small wreck detour
Author: inCHI

Thanks for the info. I didn't see the car but they seemed to be doing trackwork. Got some photos of that as well as a lot of Minnesota Commercial power.



[ Share Thread on Facebook ] [ Search ] [ Start a New Thread ] [ Back to Thread List ] [ <Newer ] [ Older> ] 
Page created in 0.028 seconds